Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2454933pxb; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 19:53:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwSyEMlT14fhmyUZ/LuajVGEg8+3H6iIMYQ5DKDiL9UzTQwMZ4qTZpt7K7xJ+S651/X4wiH X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4dc5:: with SMTP id f5mr7031124ejw.11.1612583617351; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 19:53:37 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612583617; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DmSdys+U9PwaW3yatx3+GFYr0lNwd4mKjOTxnRWCu8Ps5lY/Q6tKtNN3VBJCuZmMP0 4XK1UiHohf2OGGz72/B7HPnc+Fm5qyAaD7Xgwm1DwAYSkp8OT4L5roQhs2woKGLb/CXz M9twrqJ07gU5NR6MwYpPH8l7uCCxoGj5pG0ZvgNww3U/NU/6mVWBLcb/2FHcb2HAoa7K uqX62ko2t3Y4fJtvN1/kvNNvjlfsnx5jcdA+OnbrO7icLrKrCuzGUutqRTZ+uwxR5n1S 4T8yKG4rF3PbpMh/WQZa+ZsB6kcvCnSJM7J1jIBbZBhr8YBo9shBkU3UASEx4L3aaiXB vcTw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:references:mime-version :message-id:in-reply-to:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=8M/syFwNKdzYEjkQkOYzNkXR9VPw1LAYsj1sJNWjiBk=; b=CEp9t4657iudF+SSyqJcyqHp60YlGt7NjZRBEf2AM76sdhz+XYEXj3Dljc5gZmETbi nTcdQxRy+y86v/xW1mcC0gANtwr0SxrJztVG9DtWUDGhiFAeckaTf6WW7o8vUPaSk5bL kSPG1TJ5S90AEYsY90jJ4wugfzsz7aSm+jC0hmsaHSrhk9wh+f8Z6mv3vNsHWAcX3AEQ SuvN40qm5g+BgaMCrAb2tJlwJ023fvSAtyvWoIHlYFm+U5z8eejqzp4Sp9XCq17waXUm W7R80DOiTsldGuvHfrcJ3N0UWrRhA5svjhrzTqGc+QE8EKhdV6gueCiFTP1ky5PN1wzT VdyQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nYqPrlQ8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id w5si8566447edv.513.2021.02.05.19.53.05; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 19:53:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20161025 header.b=nYqPrlQ8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232477AbhBFDvt (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 22:51:49 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42194 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231231AbhBFCyE (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2021 21:54:04 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x849.google.com (mail-qt1-x849.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::849]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0360C08EE18 for ; Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:09:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qt1-x849.google.com with SMTP id r18so6484896qta.19 for ; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 16:09:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject :from:to:cc; bh=8M/syFwNKdzYEjkQkOYzNkXR9VPw1LAYsj1sJNWjiBk=; b=nYqPrlQ8bPXo82BHmCshPA0DrP2QyVU1c2O3OiWZplSSx//RzQLzK6rAov+1H7WHQq qSgImo1+xURHIbIRwJWoiQvS5DjEJb1ciirBRxu59NX3opYH/Og29Bt/7gVGaz1b7SGa v24/HnoK7xAW+tQISmNX5xVpV7xy5HcnvXI+gPCBX/y6nO8A3TNXVaZg1gIqqYxKQWqC 90o6q68wtbOxLY5BJCLsMt+QevKkG6pUvmMpKrO//vk4BAHPXmPqNRtDDqObSid8IJYm w323A4p0HC0+nBE68P/aAe/mBaidGo7raBzZq8xdbhY61+AIuEfDxIINk5hN35tYX7qd P5Og== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=8M/syFwNKdzYEjkQkOYzNkXR9VPw1LAYsj1sJNWjiBk=; b=HXDWWH/NUuZxlfJ0eJahEL0xjyvgnZFJAyYWHxuvTdZs1YiPdOp0KMdxMSpmfaduYB NefHv3VDNy2FH2yO3cgYGHJfe7VMOOO3E6RelLW8l741/TS5l2JojfeY2Y4mUIjc3fu3 cIaMr79rtjiJkbqYl+XTFcNLFgNn3V1ns5Kt2xd0D3kfEWcqX4g+zkdozzAN1rcNoD7W 0nSVJHJFIREbbeBJxjbgKCyjyxL6f7ucDUKgwvahkIrU8popV7frXQSuugPr4DavLUfP hyh6XjvRiRQGTv+R1nUzSzIh1KKusyok/XSwN9iSCHl7QAug86LHfccLUP16tUuh/074 hHTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530bo1Ru+1tKxtgZ+U7DUpM3L7u+8IbIrXuVRQgM5ydOZfbZ+lg5 vz1kVfKaYSVCgffpzte6uufgLYDRn5VabQ== Sender: "dlatypov via sendgmr" X-Received: from dlatypov.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:2cd:202:a8b1:128a:69fa:86fb]) (user=dlatypov job=sendgmr) by 2002:a05:6214:592:: with SMTP id bx18mr6897223qvb.32.1612570145933; Fri, 05 Feb 2021 16:09:05 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2021 16:08:52 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20210206000854.2037923-1-dlatypov@google.com> Message-Id: <20210206000854.2037923-2-dlatypov@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20210206000854.2037923-1-dlatypov@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0.478.g8a0d178c01-goog Subject: [PATCH v4 1/3] kunit: add kunit.filter_glob cmdline option to filter suites From: Daniel Latypov To: brendanhiggins@google.com Cc: davidgow@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org, Daniel Latypov Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org E.g. specifying this would run suites with "list" in their name. kunit.filter_glob=list* Note: the executor prints out a TAP header that includes the number of suites we intend to run. So unless we want to report empty results for filtered-out suites, we need to do the filtering here in the executor. It's also probably better in the executor since we most likely don't want any filtering to apply to tests built as modules. This code does add a CONFIG_GLOB=y dependency for CONFIG_KUNIT=y. But the code seems light enough that it shouldn't be an issue. For now, we only filter on suite names so we don't have to create copies of the suites themselves, just the array (of arrays) holding them. The name is rather generic since in the future, we could consider extending it to a syntax like: kunit.filter_glob=. E.g. to run all the del list tests kunit.filter_glob=list-kunit-test.*del* But at the moment, it's far easier to manually comment out test cases in test files as opposed to messing with sets of Kconfig entries to select specific suites. So even just doing this makes using kunit far less annoying. Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins --- lib/kunit/Kconfig | 1 + lib/kunit/executor.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/kunit/Kconfig b/lib/kunit/Kconfig index 00909e6a2443..0b5dfb001bac 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/Kconfig +++ b/lib/kunit/Kconfig @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ menuconfig KUNIT tristate "KUnit - Enable support for unit tests" + select GLOB if KUNIT=y help Enables support for kernel unit tests (KUnit), a lightweight unit testing and mocking framework for the Linux kernel. These tests are diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index a95742a4ece7..15832ed44668 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -1,6 +1,8 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 #include +#include +#include /* * These symbols point to the .kunit_test_suites section and are defined in @@ -11,14 +13,81 @@ extern struct kunit_suite * const * const __kunit_suites_end[]; #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) -static void kunit_print_tap_header(void) +static char *filter_glob; +module_param(filter_glob, charp, 0); +MODULE_PARM_DESC(filter_glob, + "Filter which KUnit test suites run at boot-time, e.g. list*"); + +static struct kunit_suite * const * +kunit_filter_subsuite(struct kunit_suite * const * const subsuite) +{ + int i, n = 0; + struct kunit_suite **filtered; + + n = 0; + for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) { + if (glob_match(filter_glob, subsuite[i]->name)) + ++n; + } + + if (n == 0) + return NULL; + + filtered = kmalloc_array(n + 1, sizeof(*filtered), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!filtered) + return NULL; + + n = 0; + for (i = 0; subsuite[i] != NULL; ++i) { + if (glob_match(filter_glob, subsuite[i]->name)) + filtered[n++] = subsuite[i]; + } + filtered[n] = NULL; + + return filtered; +} + +struct suite_set { + struct kunit_suite * const * const *start; + struct kunit_suite * const * const *end; +}; + +static struct suite_set kunit_filter_suites(void) +{ + int i; + struct kunit_suite * const **copy, * const *filtered_subsuite; + struct suite_set filtered; + + const size_t max = __kunit_suites_end - __kunit_suites_start; + + if (!filter_glob) { + filtered.start = __kunit_suites_start; + filtered.end = __kunit_suites_end; + return filtered; + } + + copy = kmalloc_array(max, sizeof(*filtered.start), GFP_KERNEL); + filtered.start = copy; + if (!copy) { /* won't be able to run anything, return an empty set */ + filtered.end = copy; + return filtered; + } + + for (i = 0; i < max; ++i) { + filtered_subsuite = kunit_filter_subsuite(__kunit_suites_start[i]); + if (filtered_subsuite) + *copy++ = filtered_subsuite; + } + filtered.end = copy; + return filtered; +} + +static void kunit_print_tap_header(struct suite_set *suite_set) { struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites, * const *subsuite; int num_of_suites = 0; - for (suites = __kunit_suites_start; - suites < __kunit_suites_end; - suites++) + for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) for (subsuite = *suites; *subsuite != NULL; subsuite++) num_of_suites++; @@ -30,12 +99,18 @@ int kunit_run_all_tests(void) { struct kunit_suite * const * const *suites; - kunit_print_tap_header(); + struct suite_set suite_set = kunit_filter_suites(); + + kunit_print_tap_header(&suite_set); + + for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++) + __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites); - for (suites = __kunit_suites_start; - suites < __kunit_suites_end; - suites++) - __kunit_test_suites_init(*suites); + if (filter_glob) { /* a copy was made of each array */ + for (suites = suite_set.start; suites < suite_set.end; suites++) + kfree(*suites); + kfree(suite_set.start); + } return 0; } -- 2.30.0.478.g8a0d178c01-goog