Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932211AbWIVCTN (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:19:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932209AbWIVCTN (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:19:13 -0400 Received: from tomts10.bellnexxia.net ([209.226.175.54]:22975 "EHLO tomts10-srv.bellnexxia.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932208AbWIVCTM (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:19:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 22:14:00 -0400 From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Cc: Martin Bligh , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Masami Hiramatsu , prasanna@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , Paul Mundt , linux-kernel , Jes Sorensen , Tom Zanussi , Richard J Moore , Michel Dagenais , Christoph Hellwig , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , William Cohen , ltt-dev@shafik.org, systemtap@sources.redhat.com, Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.7 for 2.6.17 (with type checking!) Message-ID: <20060922021400.GA6330@Krystal> References: <20060921232024.GA16155@Krystal> <451331A1.3020601@goop.org> <20060922020119.GA28712@Krystal> <45134539.7070305@goop.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45134539.7070305@goop.org> X-Editor: vi X-Info: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080 X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.32-grsec (i686) X-Uptime: 22:10:15 up 29 days, 23:18, 2 users, load average: 0.34, 0.35, 0.21 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1373 Lines: 35 * Jeremy Fitzhardinge (jeremy@goop.org) wrote: > Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > >#define MARK_SYM(name) \ > > do { \ > > __label__ here; \ > > volatile static void *__mark_kprobe_##name \ > > asm (MARK_CALL_PREFIX#name) \ > > __attribute__((unused)) = &&here; \ > >here: \ > > do { } while(0); \ > > } while(0) > > > >Which fixes the problem. Some tests showed me that the compiler does not > >unroll > >an otherwise unrolled loop when this specific macro is called. (test done > >with > >-funroll-all-loops). > > Eh? I thought you wanted to avoid changing the generated code? > Inhibiting loop unrolling could be a pretty large change... > Yes, if possible. But letting gcc duplicate those symbols brings many questions, such as : how can we name each of them differently ? Is there any way to automatically increment an "identifier" counter in assembly ? Mathieu OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/