Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp3622850pxb; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 16:44:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzdBtURq8iK4B/A/ia4iiVrFvsRHrDkMrmJbUGNeDDvwAzLJnIh8+1M8Y4qwDtkaCSPBBvo X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c00c:: with SMTP id e12mr14281007ejz.103.1612745091154; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 16:44:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612745091; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=zjm2E79Hg8IpXmXvTgDy/OeftT+erNj/kT6DVQo6bgJ8zSkDUCr6yy0nMms3gl3UrR AZRYqlXYXbcKvJBKpozuPtTAmOV4rr+vwlEKmOjob4voXXZyvc3cBe4iZQHySl1UcvFm xlYy6eaJhPORYvWfoTdGXTV6I9UeAlm3UD1o3BASn8scT0e3vu7vLkVg11Gof81b0jm7 3Rp2+ajgu9TD79Cvdfi2H6X1eXVDGNinLxqq3x7L9ZdjgP0floJX5kaQQKukT4KZrYab ZZiwYGwBTTZDhbMkYazRTYVk3ZoZm2u+LvgPmdyWg2F9c7/7pgyrtkc+vav+zNBgchxO Fy3Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=scV+dMxBVAPArOnjwMyEuFakmX5Lbhe8ojzXBEVTXfI=; b=RGro2d5+vBrPbasRn0QkPHIWzunyBQn4/6Ijpft4jn4Q2yZL1/b1StoDuuD3BUbU7v Y5T/jJ5MyVZu/hs1WwouU37y2q9LKT6OrRLcBG5Ix0wYCaivky5zgwMDt6/d6To3PAM3 lveXslAsXd7bqMlIJqZUROj33X3nuIAiF5E9bX5/vgxZA9tqmTFt9QHb8Xi5GIFaXh9w 89c9hZOCffk9c7sf7qSs1khnOIGZkL2IJmmQ8r+JsPCFWNzavSv+ZtNijJrtPZtVH9zK xol+PPM4WbAhEXHUJacqYyoSwuOUW68MTrB6UL689ucuql38JrsXSXRUE+CuUW+qKE00 83UA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=MxgnLAxn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g10si104437edv.460.2021.02.07.16.44.27; Sun, 07 Feb 2021 16:44:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=MxgnLAxn; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229626AbhBHAly (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 7 Feb 2021 19:41:54 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43242 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229537AbhBHAlx (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2021 19:41:53 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEA0464E37; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 00:41:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1612744873; bh=pawCFFNuxieuedqkeD8rhslUdcJnXnMbNF7lCMg+Kfw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=MxgnLAxnhDXpzhWuQaK2mYbkiLgAU9GALMHEpqZMz362Ji/YjF8X5QaYvQmCWHLvH 3jAeohdTQM6HDI8Y+NccKCsLhPG2uRtTish8xOzip7v+ySqaVNL/AwDS4MRnGGOouq vBAkzjLQ1AzSbSm78rm16Hjf/WDJ5mNhXjrKEXdJbTZkskVQao+GMM24R1kF/mSwGM I7Xeqk7L3uWvICRuI31uBiNlyT6j0q1BhegwWs/IHCKnLrm4VU9rlPpbwjBQQZbp8s ABeJJZrhNIDYzExLg//3iNTx0eUpMyqrvxCG+/Kk08siW+MD90ogCuZYYwyEb/sSzx lY+hAL+lX/5Ow== Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 02:41:04 +0200 From: Jarkko Sakkinen To: Dirk Gouders Cc: Peter Huewe , Jason Gunthorpe , James Bottomley , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] tpm_tis: handle -EPROBE_DEFER in tpm_tis_plat_probe() Message-ID: References: <20210205202022.4515-1-dirk@gouders.net> <20210205202022.4515-2-dirk@gouders.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210205202022.4515-2-dirk@gouders.net> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 09:20:22PM +0100, Dirk Gouders wrote: > tpm_tis does not consider -EPROBE_DEFER in tpm_tis_plat_probe(). > Instead, without notification it falls back to polling mode if > platform_get_irq_optional() returns a negative value. > > This could lead to different behavior depending on wether tpm_tis was > compiled builtin or as a module; in the latter case > platform_get_irq_optional() often if not always returns a valid IRQ > number on the first attempt. > > Harmonize builtin and module behavior by returning -EPROBE_DEFER, > effectively putting the device on the deferred probe list for later > probe attempts. > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Gouders This would be best picked to James' patch set. > --- > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c > index 4ed6e660273a..4cf863704aa1 100644 > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c > @@ -320,6 +320,9 @@ static int tpm_tis_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > tpm_info.irq = platform_get_irq_optional(pdev, 0); > if (tpm_info.irq <= 0) { > + if (tpm_info.irq == -EPROBE_DEFER) > + /* Enter deferred probe list and try again, later. */ > + return -EPROBE_DEFER; > if (pdev != force_pdev) > tpm_info.irq = -1; > else > -- > 2.26.2 > > /Jarkko