Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 8 Feb 2021 18:57:12 +1100 (AEDT)
From:   Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
To:     Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
cc:     jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linuxarm@openeuler.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-next 00/32] spin lock usage optimization for SCSI
 drivers
In-Reply-To: <1612697823-8073-1-git-send-email-tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <31cd807d-3d0-ed64-60d-fde32cb3833c@telegraphics.com.au>
References: <1612697823-8073-1-git-send-email-tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 7 Feb 2021, Xiaofei Tan wrote:

> Replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock in hard IRQ of SCSI drivers. 
> There are no function changes, but may speed up if interrupt happen too 
> often.

This change doesn't necessarily work on platforms that support nested 
interrupts.

Were you able to measure any benefit from this change on some other 
platform?

Please see also,
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/89c5cb05cb844939ae684db0077f675f@h3c.com/