Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1612774577-55943-1-git-send-email-luojiaxing@huawei.com> <2b8001bb-0bcd-3fea-e15c-2722e7243209@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <2b8001bb-0bcd-3fea-e15c-2722e7243209@huawei.com>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 8 Feb 2021 15:28:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcpeYpsW6B85F0u=B+GToNh=1fYdRSMeQqE0vOtOdSi8A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Linuxarm] [PATCH for next v1 0/2] gpio: few clean up patches to
 replace spin_lock_irqsave with spin_lock
To:     luojiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
        Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@kernel.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linuxarm@openeuler.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:11 AM luojiaxing <luojiaxing@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Sorry, my operation error causes a patch missing from this patch set. I
> re-send the patch set. Please check the new one.

What is the new one?! You have to give proper versioning and change
log for your series.

> On 2021/2/8 16:56, Luo Jiaxing wrote:
> > There is no need to use API with _irqsave in hard IRQ handler, So replace
> > those with spin_lock.

How do you know that another CPU in the system can't serve the
following interrupt from the hardware at the same time?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko