Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932521AbWIVOSH (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:18:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932520AbWIVOSH (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:18:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:37567 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932521AbWIVOSE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 10:18:04 -0400 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20060922123105.GA3767@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20060922123105.GA3767@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <20060922111137.16615.7794.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20060922111140.16615.46012.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> To: =?us-ascii?Q?=3D=3Fiso-8859-1=3FQ=3FJ=3DF6rn=3F=3D?= Engel Cc: David Howells , akpm@osdl.org, evil@g-house.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] AFS: Manage AFS modularity vs FS-Cache modularity X-Mailer: MH-E 8.0; nmh 1.1; GNU Emacs 22.0.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:17:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20773.1158934671@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 735 Lines: 20 J?rn Engel wrote: > At least I cannot see why the AFS patch differs from the NFS one in > those two details. Actually, what the patch itself changes doesn't differ significantly - the difference is in the patch context. > > bool "Provide AFS client caching support" > (EXPERIMENTAL) ? Well, AFS_FS is itself marked as being experimental, so I'm not sure that the AFS_FSCACHE option needs to be also. David - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/