Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp4247256pxb; Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:23:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJznwfTQPCiYngncxAZYmMzBs1Ko7Gfr90I+GhQnqgab0UMf97Awhr/cLfNcOMmMbQkNSYK1 X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9495:: with SMTP id dm21mr18364529ejc.462.1612812193115; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 11:23:13 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612812193; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=qstDjWhvDVdr8GlMy5k1rdYx2bLJW4ECwsONi0z1gG7Go8HiMvXjG/t3MHNkZWvpaq NB0vDHhAkAwH9SCnrV/c8YhKsn6FZXJBE4ngXrvH/kfj3OVHwhhSuOEyHsmuVllOahvW CC24NlIFq1lUVuadn58XC8kcP9Fo/F5EPFQqyui0m4U1IXFZ7B3aDE6T/v0bOZao+BqY bn36+Q07Yi5BO6P8BVDDc6gKOkpvzewhBQgfKzI0Qt7oRsYmgBbu32grUWelyIcv6Ojy iv3XIIu2yWHaLZjqRHHPIOuMat1DA/eZq127bPPRfwKdikMEr0HqotWlGOd0W0gd3NtB tczQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=lScv50d1ZyqagwO0c9BMwWMnexfOHV/tP4Lgw63kKHw=; b=psCyiauS2Kq+lzBaiS0g0wqId0BtZOJUcnlKlkiINbkNz53tqk2GY5aHrZT9mPObFB /APs6EyyLz1q7QQNDeRmgXLs7wQj2tGgFVKr8ZhCfsHXPAJtf5KU/OmWyziyv5PxJ7Mj Zkd1lK6b3tNakW16RowBnLZ6SrrVGYhI0MJMNOMvG+sK+SNwOQXRul4chN99oJkLjaFU yfLf1tdn/VY/ZQrFNt2OTNm1QgiwizMRRpPufFDcaDZ0GyBYCs5UyHZPD67qaEFK4aLX HqqH69RvQZxDlgTcoQJrHo8ORJlN9gUcdLwpjmFFieEPfw0/pjsiwDTLAoVr+CWl+WEe jb/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o7si11425226eja.76.2021.02.08.11.22.49; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 11:23:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235480AbhBHTUI (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 8 Feb 2021 14:20:08 -0500 Received: from mail-ot1-f42.google.com ([209.85.210.42]:43055 "EHLO mail-ot1-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235085AbhBHR7a (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2021 12:59:30 -0500 Received: by mail-ot1-f42.google.com with SMTP id l23so3348929otn.10; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:59:14 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=lScv50d1ZyqagwO0c9BMwWMnexfOHV/tP4Lgw63kKHw=; b=NtVGc0seVH58dsycl89DOE32awTKybGHAgq0XeMsL6JjsVgGVmag/ZOeDXwnTTzUTV CQFDH7WD9WbG+X/loq1cMw+GQauiSeGG5HAI537J/V8bQLK+CGCQCiBr9+J10OZcmLyA NImIaorLQYqpCEGNa8x4N6z4VM8+ZowJ5QZC+2kJxrS1/RxMpw1niloLe1GOKWpiWqSw nC8Yj8+yH5YQ5w6gPu9HAERLGtyuzmoWKA2IFJT4Pt/konC6M+DqrdougDX/9FO96TWt 66q3x0D6zObIdqqsgCVi6UqRpWGG3LVUEYVVfCCvxzFAhRxaH1j3OojAleVYz1KC4gsh i/iw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533kxJo1FkWV3cUfZ8XNUD8WIUNq3TJdwJS7zRUoTmSY05y9dE4j dDigsF/p4q/WSI8HF2laBA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:22d7:: with SMTP id q23mr5443543otc.71.1612807129548; Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:58:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from robh.at.kernel.org (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u73sm3668919oie.30.2021.02.08.09.58.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 09:58:48 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 1618899 invoked by uid 1000); Mon, 08 Feb 2021 17:58:47 -0000 Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2021 11:58:47 -0600 From: Rob Herring To: Hector Martin Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Krzysztof Kozlowski , DTML , Marc Zyngier , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , SoC Team , Olof Johansson , Linux ARM Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/18] arm64: apple: Add initial Mac Mini 2020 (M1) devicetree Message-ID: <20210208175847.GB1567700@robh.at.kernel.org> References: <20210204203951.52105-1-marcan@marcan.st> <20210204203951.52105-19-marcan@marcan.st> <20210208110441.25qc6yken4effd6c@kozik-lap> <20210208121325.owjjd7nfbdanszny@kozik-lap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 11:12:52PM +0900, Hector Martin wrote: > On 08/02/2021 21.40, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 1:13 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 08:56:53PM +0900, Hector Martin 'marcan' wrote: > > > > On 08/02/2021 20.04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > > > apple > > > > > > > > > > Don't make things different for this one platform (comparing to all > > > > > other platforms). Apple is not that special. :) > > > > > > > > AAPL is the old vendor prefix used in the PowerPC era. I'm happy to use > > > > `apple`, as long as we're OK with having two different prefixes for the same > > > > vendor, one for PPC and one for ARM64. I've seen opinions go both ways on > > > > this one :) > > > > > > Thanks for explanation. I propose to choose just "apple". Sticking to > > > old vendor name is not a requirement - we have few vendor prefixes which > > > were marked as deprecated because we switched to a better one. > > > > We've gone back and forth on this a few times already. My current > > preference would also be to go with "apple", not because it's somehow > > nicer or clearer but because it avoids the namespace conflict with > > what the Apple firmware uses: It's only AAPL,phandle and AAPL,unit-string (equivalent to unit-address) AFAICT which are really internal format details. So it's really 'apple' that could conflct, but I can't see that mattering. > Ack, I'll use 'apple' for v2. 3 votes for 'apple'. You all get to pick the color of this shed. > Amusingly, Apple actually use 'apple,firestorm' and 'apple,icestorm' for the > CPUs in their devicetrees for these machines, so those will end up identical > :) (they don't use apple-related prefixes for any other compatible strings > at all, it's a mess). But we don't care about what their ADTs (Apple DTs) do > in Linux anyway, the bootloader abstracts all that out and we'll be dealing > with mantaining proper DTs ourselves. > > > > Makes sense. In such case it's indeed your work. Since you introduce it, > > > the DTSes are usually licensed with (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT). > > > > Indeed, we do want other OSs to use our dts files, so the general > > preference is to have a permissive license, unless you have a strong > > reason yourself to require GPL-only. > > Thanks for pointing this out; this was actually unintentional. I based it > off of an old dts I'd written ages ago and forgot to revisit the license. I > even have it marked GPL-2.0+ in the copy in our bootloader repo, which is > otherwise supposed to be MIT for original code... I'll also highlight there's a DT only tree[1] available to import DT related parts to other projects. It's generated from the kernel tree. Probably an overkill to copying at this point though. Rob [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/devicetree/devicetree-rebasing.git/