Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through
 sysfs too
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
Message-Id: <161282821288.13069.16334035236215483610.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 08 Feb 2021 23:50:12 +0000
References: <20210207194733.1811529-1-olteanv@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210207194733.1811529-1-olteanv@gmail.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Cc:     kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, andrew@lunn.ch,
        vivien.didelot@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, roopa@nvidia.com,
        nikolay@nvidia.com, jiri@resnulli.us, idosch@idosch.org
Precedence: bulk

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):

On Sun,  7 Feb 2021 21:47:33 +0200 you wrote:
> From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
> 
> Looking through patchwork I don't see that there was any consensus to
> use switchdev notifiers only in case of netlink provided port flags but
> not sysfs (as a sort of deprecation, punishment or anything like that),
> so we should probably keep the user interface consistent in terms of
> functionality.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net] net: bridge: use switchdev for port flags set through sysfs too
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8043c845b63a

You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html