Subject: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>
In-Reply-To: <200609221430.55889.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
References: <1158941750.3445.31.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
	 <200609221359.39519.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
	 <1158948497.3445.55.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
	 <200609221430.55889.gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 20:05:07 +0100
Message-Id: <1158951907.24572.23.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 836
Lines: 16

Ar Gwe, 2006-09-22 am 14:30 -0400, ysgrifennodd Gene Heskett:
> final.  Let me put it this way, I would be willing to become a paying 
> member of a new organization dedicated to preserving the V2 status if the 
> due weren't too onnerous. 

What probably matters more in that situation, and I hope its one that
doesn't arise - v3 is in draft and there is fixing time left for many
issues - is people to maintain the other projects which will get forked
from the FSF if it were to happen: glibc, gcc, etc. My guess is many of
these projects would effectively leave the FSF if this happened.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/