Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932104AbWIVSxn (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:53:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932108AbWIVSxR (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:53:17 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:63247 "EHLO spitz.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932104AbWIVSxO (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:53:14 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 13:16:36 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: Andrew Morton Cc: Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: release cycle (Re: 2.6.19 -mm merge plans) Message-ID: <20060922131635.GE4055@ucw.cz> References: <20060920135438.d7dd362b.akpm@osdl.org> <45121382.1090403@garzik.org> <20060920220744.0427539d.akpm@osdl.org> <45123307.8090809@garzik.org> <20060920234828.a86e095a.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060920234828.a86e095a.akpm@osdl.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1417 Lines: 33 Hi! > > > If you think that shortening the release cycle will cause people to be more > > > disciplined in their changes, to spend less time going berzerk and to spend > > > more time working with our users and testers on known bugs then I'm all > > > ears. > > > > Honestly, I do think it would be positive. It would shorten the > > feedback loop, and get more changes out to testers. > > > > It would also decrease the pressure of the 60+ trees trying to get > > everything in, because they know the next release is 3-4 months away. > > It would be _much_ easier to say "break the generic device stuff in > > 2.6.20 not 2.6.19, please" if we knew 2.6.20 wasn't going to be a 2007 > > release. > > Well, it might be worth trying. But there's a practical problem: how do we > get there when there's so much work pending? If we skip some people's > trees then they'll get sore, and it's not obvious that it'll help much, as > the various trees are fairly unrelated (ie: parallelisable). Well, slightly evil way would be 'if we find vfs changes in your ocfs tree, well, you wait for one more release' :-). Pavel -- Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/