Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp316384pxb; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 00:43:43 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwrkoR3LYYEoZUxJwlabqAB7Y5weNpVUct/eZX7pT//kmV//QLeOJd70Iut4/iW/8eryRKg X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:aa9:: with SMTP id bz9mr20430477ejc.528.1612860223321; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 00:43:43 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612860223; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0MnrwAIO/s+KokGM1SGkNXyBpN2lSxUWgNYGRtxpuJowBQ1B3ivo3s8J9yfffJltuu YXVlCOoqIGqINmDUttbYuf7XyM3uC1/4SJOoixyXguIH8x4EIF/6ayY5cOncGNaWHUD3 0h3uAdI/BnOlqpZ91k3qmpXKD8xZiqePp38TAm8Kwvi+SJBQ18eECyzQwmBkrUPYJ5QO fv049Ak/0TwhKs8POcL/H8XddQQh/j3UCrvs7WtAHDJQtyKwYND0Ygzk2VLcHPSY61Cy 1YwYNnMo1evc8ln9IEzyN80b2QdGz6/6iDlvwAEATNTd7S2l6GAP+zJ96Z54Ry2ieOds 5zrg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=ChzYY0c5Iz/EDroW9Gp2d3Y4yrxj6R1o6bawn1H2xic=; b=qMxtKh3pA42eKVQB2gL+zeW7vGKZijJnH7C+Asm3S16A6bWycdylqedNVbVEgxICLc MXc1xOPWzjIPysvJyJfUd13uBOSQnTjd6+asPep6bvR8vQB95E4hQhMrrxjXtGyoEYr6 AINsoKuBSf7jPUxUqlNwHfK9qtBm+1p0AUdUX6YE5fY4xIJSqYC+sE4N8qk53/XzItkK PLQxWJxBdLbP2QaVTEMbceGtNNgbDDejdta/8Qb4ItdSDC1ZL4CQ8NMHtUNbm9cXObRU R/6pDf9CHg+o7CABfktVWd+aKtJrDkMpg3/LaNqz5wy0xEp1ZTsewpJbteXmsIS0PfgC 8aUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=I5HLu1M6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d26si13733540edu.160.2021.02.09.00.43.20; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 00:43:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=I5HLu1M6; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229731AbhBIImu (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 03:42:50 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:51260 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229972AbhBIImf (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 03:42:35 -0500 Received: from mail-lf1-x12f.google.com (mail-lf1-x12f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8674C06178A for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 00:42:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lf1-x12f.google.com with SMTP id r65so3624796lff.6 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 00:42:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ChzYY0c5Iz/EDroW9Gp2d3Y4yrxj6R1o6bawn1H2xic=; b=I5HLu1M62gaa5nODf3Wucx2CEMEQxfJkJgo74kx3OIL0kyZRtKHr9AK2hK36oLoFVy d+444QrBQry1Z8njdHiOLYWIehYwwagVw34aY/Mft1QAmy3l0SYp717P4MxW4od7XWvX pbHcYMp7eIDgZICrV9a1Jy1zNDmBDiWusMQv/2mxHjv2D2fyTKhfCsUQ1OAg3HxQu9KC YkSq6X0+mazQ7iutE0+s+LuI2e44vABZSm3O7qTedU5ISeMndtv0HgqnudcYNtNtDgHL QVGpu3QQz2lCXbCxtFvcxI0NkqXjLOQpCqDrpWjFF6rfTiiQBCmKNG5/QlOFjznn9INh ed5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ChzYY0c5Iz/EDroW9Gp2d3Y4yrxj6R1o6bawn1H2xic=; b=QKBHnhg3weKAEYyFVw5qT5niHWHF7yTX0iSO0d+d2IqQjLMaDSHz8Hpp7uwZ+pMHZC D0pAbPcxUBhm0hTSV00ofUneSCvWdEE2mPXc2P607drWgGuFWrNfBa0YJiPI5aJQMntg Q7CY8NvEswlsbK3V6XXxxm0yRlUEDwnFJ7+Yn8t8XSXdoD/8N0bULVuWoz0O1HzjTlJe 40j7xgt7kA6cUFczYPpIqSlNbi+i3+T1i3s3tAXNILdb/9FlnO3dT2FqVt41rIIrk+dz w9aOFABqhndphr6EpcZPZY+XEO7bvoRtk5pXfVrgDBf8IzLFSX63j1542VdhX0ym70gb 04sA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kC13Ura7nL1Ikx4PQtQMjQxNTWg1CCiYbaJMnX/mVCHYt7zwN JEGE7aOil+70fOCu9i2MpXXQTQ/D3Pn0u4HwQ2WJgQ== X-Received: by 2002:a19:e219:: with SMTP id z25mr6148194lfg.254.1612860131181; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 00:42:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210128183141.28097-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20210128183141.28097-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com> In-Reply-To: <20210128183141.28097-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com> From: Vincent Guittot Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 09:42:00 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] sched/fair: Add more sched_asym_cpucapacity static branch checks To: Valentin Schneider Cc: linux-kernel , Rik van Riel , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Dietmar Eggemann , Morten Rasmussen , Qais Yousef , Quentin Perret , Pavan Kondeti Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 19:32, Valentin Schneider wrote: > > Rik noted a while back that a handful of > > sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY > > & family in the CFS load-balancer code aren't guarded by the > sched_asym_cpucapacity static branch. > > The load-balancer is already doing a humongous amount of work, but turning > those checks into NOPs for those who don't need it is fairly > straightforward, so do that. It would be good to get figures showing an improvement. We are there in the LB which is a slow path. Whereas using the static branch in fast path makes sense, I don't see the benefit there. Also why not doing the same for others like SD_ASYM_PACKING. I'm not convinced by this change which IMO doesn't provide any benefit but adds complexity. > > Suggested-by: Rik van Riel > Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider > --- > kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 ++++++----- > kernel/sched/sched.h | 6 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > index 0f6a4e58ce3c..7d01fa0bfc7e 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > @@ -8465,7 +8465,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, > continue; > > /* Check for a misfit task on the cpu */ > - if (env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY && > + if (sd_has_asym_cpucapacity(env->sd) && > sgs->group_misfit_task_load < rq->misfit_task_load) { > sgs->group_misfit_task_load = rq->misfit_task_load; > *sg_status |= SG_OVERLOAD; > @@ -8522,7 +8522,8 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env, > * CPUs in the group should either be possible to resolve > * internally or be covered by avg_load imbalance (eventually). > */ > - if (sgs->group_type == group_misfit_task && > + if (static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity) && > + sgs->group_type == group_misfit_task && > (!group_smaller_max_cpu_capacity(sg, sds->local) || > sds->local_stat.group_type != group_has_spare)) > return false; > @@ -8605,7 +8606,7 @@ static bool update_sd_pick_busiest(struct lb_env *env, > * throughput. Maximize throughput, power/energy consequences are not > * considered. > */ > - if ((env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY) && > + if (sd_has_asym_cpucapacity(env->sd) && > (sgs->group_type <= group_fully_busy) && > (group_smaller_min_cpu_capacity(sds->local, sg))) > return false; > @@ -8728,7 +8729,7 @@ static inline void update_sg_wakeup_stats(struct sched_domain *sd, > } > > /* Check if task fits in the group */ > - if (sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY && > + if (sd_has_asym_cpucapacity(sd) && > !task_fits_capacity(p, group->sgc->max_capacity)) { > sgs->group_misfit_task_load = 1; > } > @@ -9419,7 +9420,7 @@ static struct rq *find_busiest_queue(struct lb_env *env, > * Higher per-CPU capacity is considered better than balancing > * average load. > */ > - if (env->sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY && > + if (sd_has_asym_cpucapacity(env->sd) && > capacity_of(env->dst_cpu) < capacity && > nr_running == 1) > continue; > diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h > index 045b01064c1e..21bd71f58c06 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h > +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h > @@ -1482,6 +1482,12 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_packing); > DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain __rcu *, sd_asym_cpucapacity); > extern struct static_key_false sched_asym_cpucapacity; > > +static inline bool sd_has_asym_cpucapacity(struct sched_domain *sd) > +{ > + return static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity) && > + sd->flags & SD_ASYM_CPUCAPACITY; > +} > + > struct sched_group_capacity { > atomic_t ref; > /* > -- > 2.27.0 >