Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp428046pxb; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 04:09:07 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyM3pBIgYr5FxTgNIVtY/ApCp58GN9wfkcuyBx9O0kIGmM5ak1QtM74Yiwqi4aL+skav5GS X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c7d8:: with SMTP id o24mr22816033eds.328.1612872547417; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 04:09:07 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612872547; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rmn0YgAvhlF9/OEhxJzJLD2i509PPwqvSTl04sJa6atZ47W9udmgYFu8jqXXk5xwqe Gt8M5MdJCiYIaAMdcWSPwkBuMfYdKnM2QdjT6HcpD/+uX7jGlJAj5FcOyQaOEHxp7YRg +PA0qMsZ92JTAxAVZLIcwr/hJPJIEOthFtUX/LihFOhpzc7YjdYIZOFjBKBJjZFNgdsi XFTpmlT8UnPbWsXtzPLW3fT2dMNyFuo5pgCzoZ+ZTm2JtjpTOnd+xG6FvoAwcwa+tnoD 2cjvUHdvQh4lZx7AqaGxaOsvT67rMcd6odyI3kPy8dBWzSDXIqjMXooqppMATxQeeMuB 0ifQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=z9doR+9vOK9RlBmYZzsCIcnjA2plivTcsj2FzX3H/J8=; b=HP7kr9M9xTDKmGtp8tzo2MWRW4X5lpzj5dlSvA7g2SZmCAJruMHT5uHSzmoHirMJGb 81EV5wNMe2jyh2Zwl3ktsZQNCV4L6CIKbslNvUM7MkPBWJZMEHwqNprMVmTdkBRMMxOg apMyD3FDXlHocjj5weumrbDBUq2tdwuBFjJHOSAtmQsWYYQx8VQ5iu1xVgGLo67hBJDL lGGARLKJZo+s5+dQe+kmULrPyGpclzwlUh4/C6BGsrHKIOAd/oJfstCMfcgJ3VR4dYr1 kkxvv8apjF4G1U6RYukryzIV8JzNev7q26qXn/VrWnIJDFaZR1amxipronRBY5t80nkm bZUA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bu8si4646877edb.349.2021.02.09.04.08.42; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 04:09:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229742AbhBIMEy (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 07:04:54 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:53338 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229611AbhBIMDd (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 07:03:33 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C57E64DB1; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:02:42 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Vincenzo Frascino Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Andrew Morton , Will Deacon , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Marco Elver , Evgenii Stepanov , Branislav Rankov , Andrey Konovalov , Lorenzo Pieralisi Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 7/7] kasan: don't run tests in async mode Message-ID: <20210209120241.GF1435@arm.com> References: <20210208165617.9977-1-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> <20210208165617.9977-8-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210208165617.9977-8-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 04:56:17PM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote: > From: Andrey Konovalov > > Asynchronous KASAN mode doesn't guarantee that a tag fault will be > detected immediately and causes tests to fail. Forbid running them > in asynchronous mode. > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov That's missing your SoB. > diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c > index 7285dcf9fcc1..f82d9630cae1 100644 > --- a/lib/test_kasan.c > +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c > @@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ static int kasan_test_init(struct kunit *test) > kunit_err(test, "can't run KASAN tests with KASAN disabled"); > return -1; > } > + if (kasan_flag_async) { > + kunit_err(test, "can't run KASAN tests in async mode"); > + return -1; > + } > > multishot = kasan_save_enable_multi_shot(); > hw_set_tagging_report_once(false); I think we can still run the kasan tests in async mode if we check the TFSR_EL1 at the end of each test by calling mte_check_tfsr_exit(). -- Catalin