Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 9 Feb 2021 08:17:44 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Aleksander Morgado <aleksander@aleksander.es>
Cc:     Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@codeaurora.org>,
        Bhaumik Bhatt <bbhatt@codeaurora.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v18 0/3] userspace MHI client interface driver
Message-ID: <20210209081744.43eea7b5@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAP7ucLZ5jKbKriSp39OtDLotbv72eBWKFCfqCbAF854kCBU8w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1609958656-15064-1-git-send-email-hemantk@codeaurora.org>
        <20210113152625.GB30246@work>
        <YBGDng3VhE1Yw6zt@kroah.com>
        <20210201105549.GB108653@thinkpad>
        <YBfi573Bdfxy0GBt@kroah.com>
        <20210201121322.GC108653@thinkpad>
        <20210202042208.GB840@work>
        <20210202201008.274209f9@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
        <835B2E08-7B84-4A02-B82F-445467D69083@linaro.org>
        <20210203100508.1082f73e@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
        <CAMZdPi8o44RPTGcLSvP0nptmdUEmJWFO4HkCB_kjJvfPDgchhQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <20210203104028.62d41962@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
        <CAAP7ucLZ5jKbKriSp39OtDLotbv72eBWKFCfqCbAF854kCBU8w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 10:20:30 +0100 Aleksander Morgado wrote:
> This may be a stupid suggestion, but would the integration look less a
> backdoor if it would have been named "mhi_wwan" and it exposed already
> all the AT+DIAG+QMI+MBIM+NMEA possible channels as chardevs, not just
> QMI?

What's DIAG? Who's going to remember that this is a backdoor driver 
a year from now when Qualcomm sends a one liner patches which just 
adds a single ID to open another channel?