Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp924633pxb; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 16:53:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzveJqSH/0mEDx5PeTDFIV7pJqALpPLxGm2TOT/pxkIOn3BuJUaEz60e5ppWHKgnomxdUDT X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1398:: with SMTP id b24mr802101edv.108.1612918424197; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 16:53:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612918424; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bumsjov1UAS8C6Byx9ZYR1CF2Ipq34Ow3L6wG4/ziSkxbRW3uPD1rtfeDI3sX6iwgf g/05hD2mr8L1WRiLtVtcsZnTZJ79Tg184K8RPRW0+q35yf1YE+6jOsPYSSY/NsnyfmJh D34urxC5gOunF0/3kMPrvmIzjktZ87+XRfEtAgvZYQG78+4R8134y/eX4xYMJnW0wTVY 19MJF9nC9gIVNfXZOFfig/UqEpwxb05zNFiyoaTuhbdTsTUUScwdf7NObumzUB2bL1L+ QUebzDR2/Gf1x5B3k6/11KbEPchcy9E3YzdRzvtbET1epSmSUX01BKg64AZkkhvLXuuW R6cw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :ironport-sdr:ironport-sdr; bh=+DVKs7jAZNKqlblqPazHt3SZJNkiKb89oOVRg5NIn48=; b=o3aw52IAk74MoX9uN7cs+xj3jut9/iPdq3l6T1NVU1aupqut6wSihoWjJkfT9oQ1SA RU3d/egwV5zG7AOsMY53UoBmTl4fiLCr234HUJ25Y0IZaP2IQgzkWxmT+rqpK76wosuE Vp4Rx9jBVqkJ5qxB+czRykX3b+qp1xmw6Y/cgK+JDcskaRJHqc7HvLsaVRuD3zddT3Y4 jK4AA+9itFpUqiBkN24ZtNX7yY4jqpoOV9DEUHg83AgTQJ2pAu8g7v2niQO1TNQ9TPam hXWHSpHPgtfgSki1kSE4frwvk9lakTD79uMvmeBNedZRvj6j2cJ1B/LbLeoMoj7JCL8z DorQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y6si312419edp.196.2021.02.09.16.53.21; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 16:53:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234730AbhBJAwq (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 19:52:46 -0500 Received: from mga12.intel.com ([192.55.52.136]:8467 "EHLO mga12.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231395AbhBIWLG (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:11:06 -0500 IronPort-SDR: BqpNjUBAt8Oeg9Z+FKo5kPTGcpnKBMsxBkM7iaBfZ+l0zWn8t7z6+k9kPWIXCAugjKbep0wZzX VBCiYTTBsWcw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9890"; a="161113142" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,166,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="161113142" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2021 13:30:34 -0800 IronPort-SDR: LudR3XWil918DSthPWyyBqoO8EWHAOIRC8WyvaRhVpXmHic1CIkS6jcfhCD68569+SMYdn4DS/ xKcXcqLESlDQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,166,1610438400"; d="scan'208";a="361953013" Received: from skl-02.jf.intel.com ([10.54.74.28]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2021 13:30:34 -0800 From: Tim Chen To: Andrew Morton , Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Vladimir Davydov Cc: Tim Chen , Dave Hansen , Ying Huang , linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mm: Fix dropped memcg from mem cgroup soft limit tree Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 12:29:45 -0800 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org During soft limit memory reclaim, we will temporarily remove the target mem cgroup from the cgroup soft limit tree. We then perform memory reclaim, update the memory usage excess count and re-insert the mem cgroup back into the mem cgroup soft limit tree according to the new memory usage excess count. However, when memory reclaim failed for a maximum number of attempts and we bail out of the reclaim loop, we forgot to put the target mem cgroup chosen for next reclaim back to the soft limit tree. This prevented pages in the mem cgroup from being reclaimed in the future even though the mem cgroup exceeded its soft limit. Fix the logic and put the mem cgroup back on the tree when page reclaim failed for the mem cgroup. Reviewed-by: Ying Huang Signed-off-by: Tim Chen --- mm/memcontrol.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index ed5cc78a8dbf..a51bf90732cb 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -3505,8 +3505,12 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_soft_limit_reclaim(pg_data_t *pgdat, int order, loop > MEM_CGROUP_MAX_SOFT_LIMIT_RECLAIM_LOOPS)) break; } while (!nr_reclaimed); - if (next_mz) + if (next_mz) { + spin_lock_irq(&mctz->lock); + __mem_cgroup_insert_exceeded(next_mz, mctz, excess); + spin_unlock_irq(&mctz->lock); css_put(&next_mz->memcg->css); + } return nr_reclaimed; } -- 2.20.1