Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp973079pxb; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 18:29:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzrmyvz8bxJpf39wuEU/Uha/8xrTRIHWa6PFMFxG+YyKTPFL7ExFt+efZvw6PDztwBojshS X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3484:: with SMTP id g4mr729537ejb.38.1612924177885; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 18:29:37 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612924177; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xkxJlJJrMdhsAB4n0cGw2tUPl0QEcuaCwJt7nsj/HjANTaAhrosiLfUhd44B/w2/Yo yzpc3n8h2z+BL7qyYvY5fHVv5vtwbtV6qioEK+zfxXXcsFRt09j6JEcxBkOGZf625Yla oENol39MivzQ3v3g3kvfV8SF0o78FudqpzApxqVZjD1eRx8CjsPg+7mrC2iD7XSORbtR JLID6RqY1oub0h6hxeB3afCTv6pkxbHdmrggPT69NPtCKR/BRhfPsj0/6W6kn0K1rIB7 o7A5QioOqq1qmMV/UfITXGNygH6Vo7FY+NrzpQs+YBnIV2AayCUe7GF3nxrDhzYbTtJ1 uDhQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :mime-version:in-reply-to:references:cc:to:subject:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=oLW+n5w0pghmkNj2ep8nCPeAU0s26nQfvVVpmEbyunM=; b=mCkXGK9hW94A5nAa+ABo5Ig6ZZKbuAIYWdRyu6HQV7sDuMX/X7r6PxaTtC4ntWoIU6 Nc+W5PYXavaIShqKg/GoOQj7A1ic7juYuHxF/sRdJogAUc2Dcuzrnx/qqLrrfIb97mx7 Nr29F9wd/FN0q5dtyxPaOXAmN1Ns28gaaxg0TgLRVIrM7pwQmspvbSRi1rDM7jXZnW2V BquUzjiXaJTqstF/yUll7ChjXV8G5Nrf7ILR6rRG7/srogdR/mfroYYsRlVWOj5TduVs 9hVluQAu/6iw0BBrqepclQUUzPEZ/Vmetfb1CmJllOLZ7ZP/L8PHRpms86Lbksnuq+EY vylA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lOPNp9fF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jy25si322202ejc.530.2021.02.09.18.29.14; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 18:29:37 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lOPNp9fF; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235452AbhBJC2J (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 21:28:09 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49822 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235160AbhBJB61 (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2021 20:58:27 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x102b.google.com (mail-pj1-x102b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F899C061574 for ; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:57:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x102b.google.com with SMTP id d2so246241pjs.4 for ; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:57:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oLW+n5w0pghmkNj2ep8nCPeAU0s26nQfvVVpmEbyunM=; b=lOPNp9fFMtEacEN782fXGeE95Kdh37rGdiUidWXHnY98Nrevlcw+Efy/0o211FTwMz 1/kFVmyhObSCsMwK6dLGptAylcMJt4OpAvCw4NY8eYpiVQtloRdNjN3G5Qq0S7a4qOny vVoK+GoBEkiZm3n7N5h1ts/Kqn+0ExSl9hpvJ5EIIZzW8McWqME5U8Yf0FEMs+v7YvDB O8N153T+UN6Nuz80eM6/cXYdu2S1YbU2cmkczrjRlPjt8kIIDMEnWYIyqvn/EWWYTkCo S2G0EQzENA+dvh7xLhfgUDDFj5HddiRjZPMsIvn63nJgsJjGDn+T4QNlMlnKfyILkeMA kPcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:message-id:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oLW+n5w0pghmkNj2ep8nCPeAU0s26nQfvVVpmEbyunM=; b=NIqzGTUm8DWrCPxYHiQkmWKJ4I7Mu1bg3yZZCniLJywK7JIMZ+x/KXDE3HaBuTARwd ZdWJt1V5gaRJf8rqgKB3wVa4DkdGTJmpOliVoq6VS4H7I+JiWEwkZnhPPxmQYBScIJGg BEBx83z9PdacGJrj8SrGfTStVLVwtqHo1/CWWjEfV60sVBMsSbfjU54dIDlD4xAjF6Mw hnw+jIG+rA4sdLmRh7Kn//ANobOYVj/z1Tr2vEnUKDlpz8sxDkGBsNT/SjrzxR9+Pdji Q7dkcH7dURmNY7kE4se7vOfJXaiuZ9qjnvTMOiK2LDJAsKNlfHcg3ijQDdQd7EeK58Fa lYkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533ZvZFQ9O88MiXliNOIyBoanbYJVAATWvHjeD1IJcuJc3y3kcOk Ad016nevabr1lHbs9i/dgKw= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:a5cb:b029:de:cd0b:1424 with SMTP id t11-20020a170902a5cbb02900decd0b1424mr647751plq.63.1612922266884; Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:57:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (14-201-150-91.tpgi.com.au. [14.201.150.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b14sm185543pfi.74.2021.02.09.17.57.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 09 Feb 2021 17:57:45 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:57:40 +1000 From: Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 18/22] powerpc/syscall: Remove FULL_REGS verification in system_call_exception To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Christophe Leroy , Michael Ellerman , msuchanek@suse.de, Paul Mackerras Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org References: <6bef4d9ba0cba50160d13e344ee4627ebdf801dc.1612796617.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> <1612836023.l122pe2n2b.astroid@bobo.none> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <1612922197.2b51jxzeqs.astroid@bobo.none> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 10, 2021 12:31 am: >=20 >=20 > Le 09/02/2021 =C3=A0 03:02, Nicholas Piggin a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0: >> Excerpts from Christophe Leroy's message of February 9, 2021 1:10 am: >>> For book3s/64, FULL_REGS() is 'true' at all time, so the test voids. >>> For others, non volatile registers are saved inconditionally. >>> >>> So the verification is pointless. >>> >>> Should one fail to do it, it would anyway be caught by the >>> CHECK_FULL_REGS() in copy_thread() as we have removed the >>> special versions ppc_fork() and friends. >>> >>> null_syscall benchmark reduction 4 cycles (332 =3D> 328 cycles) >>=20 >> I wonder if we rather make a CONFIG option for a bunch of these simpler >> debug checks here (and also in interrupt exit, wrappers, etc) rather >> than remove them entirely. >=20 > We can drop this patch if you prefer. Anyway, like book3s/64, once ppc32 = also do interrupt=20 > entry/exit in C, FULL_REGS() will already return true. Sure let's do that. Thanks, Nick