Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210205115153.799dc024@canb.auug.org.au> <CAHp75VfiyAtxg+wqZ30kSzCfFFsLndLjzrUc1njZG0x6vQeyBQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75Vdrnmnu3vfmtEmnU=dH9tjoZtSZUtgDNXp29E90tT+j7A@mail.gmail.com>
 <3936997.7vkU7uULjK@kreacher> <CAHp75VcUP1475T_jWQkZkjhZrfNEZ6UaOopm5v1WBOPoriTE3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHp75VfS=LgZfY6KTZeM7B+PgKpV3x_4zytszdaS=43A7BJEZQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VfS=LgZfY6KTZeM7B+PgKpV3x_4zytszdaS=43A7BJEZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 9 Feb 2021 15:32:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jbg8KWmmiAV0YrvndcbaY3CApUbPsTYVgxH-0HspZW3A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pm tree
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 8:48 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:47 PM Andy Shevchenko
> <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 9:30 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Friday, February 5, 2021 12:15:22 PM CET Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:14 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Friday, February 5, 2021, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >> After merging the pm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > > > >> failed like this:
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > > Rafael, maybe I was unclear when explaining to you the dependencies with the series of series, but all three parts should go ordered. In any case it’s easy to fix. I will send you a PR late today of the immutable tag (part 1) that needs to be included in order to avoid the above.
> > > >
> > > > PR had just been sent to linux-acpi@ and Rafael in Cc.
> > >
> > > I haven't seen that PR, though, in any of my inboxes etc.
> > >
> > > Can you please point me to an archive or similar where I can find it?
> >
> > Sure, lore has it
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/YB0mPPgpIpQzhNXS@smile.fi.intel.com/T/#u
>
> If it is possible, please pull that PR and on top of that (re-)apply
> the MFD related series.

Done (merged into the bleeding-edge branch).

I was confused by it apparently asking Linus to pull. :-)