Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:58:47 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@gmail.com>
Cc:     Tushar Khandelwal <Tushar.Khandelwal@arm.com>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH Resend] mailbox: arm_mhuv2: Fix sparse warnings
Message-ID: <20210210062847.tptyycw6au5baype@vireshk-i7>
References: <db5dd593cfd8b428ce44c1cce7484d887fa5e67c.1612869229.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
 <CABb+yY3QkiZqWLJ8LmXXVy0n-UN1YxxbBOMcnTmHTe6WLeKmpA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CABb+yY3QkiZqWLJ8LmXXVy0n-UN1YxxbBOMcnTmHTe6WLeKmpA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 10-02-21, 00:25, Jassi Brar wrote:
> Yup any bug fix should be sent in rc. But this, imo, lies on the
> boundary of code and cosmetic issues, so I practiced discretion to
> keep it for the next pull request lest I won't have much to send ;)

Fair enough, would have been better though if you could have replied
with this earlier. I had no clue on what's going on until this email
came from you :)

Thanks anyway.

-- 
viresh