Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210203154332.470587-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
 <5bc4f5b7-5370-bdd5-143e-429c83447ce1@microchip.com> <161291845517.418021.17378265940034341908@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
 <CAGETcx9fjRhNmEMF2QoerrzGctC6MMTy+_znVTgPEm1w-+ehqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMuHMdWBZq8n6-8e-GYEEs0V9ZW--CSDCs=+u_bkr=aRW4y=ZA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGETcx--6Pm=KfgFi50Dzin0+760nd-t9w9VxZxcn2Che-G1nQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGETcx--6Pm=KfgFi50Dzin0+760nd-t9w9VxZxcn2Che-G1nQ@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:10:41 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWs-GqN-7tEPFfOeTQbvOH58T6WbBtVLsMNLT5qOHxsHA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks
To:     Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        Ludovic Desroches <Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com>,
        Nicolas Ferre <Nicolas.Ferre@microchip.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl,
        Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com>,
        a.fatoum@pengutronix.de, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
        Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Saravana,

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 9:57 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:51 AM Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:57 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > Quoting Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com (2021-02-08 01:49:45)
> > > > > Do you plan to take this patch for v5.12?
> > > > > If fw_devlink will remain set to ON for v5.12, some of our boards will
> > > > > no longer boot without this patch.
> > > >
> > > > Is fw_devlink defaulted to on for v5.12?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> >
> > Have all issues been identified and understood?
> > Have all issues been fixed, reviewed, and committed?
> > Have all fixes entered linux-next?
> > Have all fixes been migrated from submaintainers to maintainers?
>
> I'm hoping Tudor has reported and the fixes that have gone in so far
> addressed all his issues. Otherwise, they need to be reported so we
> can fix them.
>
> As of now, there's no pending fix that hasn't landed in maintainer
> trees. So that's good.

You're talking about driver core fixes.
What about driver fixes? E.g. pull request for (arm-)soc should be
srnt before -rc6.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds