Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 11:53:34 +0100
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        borntraeger@de.ibm.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
        alex.williamson@redhat.com, pasic@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] s390/vfio-ap: fix circular lockdep when
 setting/clearing crypto masks
Message-ID: <20210210115334.46635966.cohuck@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210209194830.20271-2-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
References: <20210209194830.20271-1-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
        <20210209194830.20271-2-akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
Organization: Red Hat GmbH
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue,  9 Feb 2021 14:48:30 -0500
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> This patch fixes a circular locking dependency in the CI introduced by
> commit f21916ec4826 ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM
> pointer invalidated"). The lockdep only occurs when starting a Secure
> Execution guest. Crypto virtualization (vfio_ap) is not yet supported for
> SE guests; however, in order to avoid CI errors, this fix is being
> provided.
> 
> The circular lockdep was introduced when the masks in the guest's APCB
> were taken under the matrix_dev->lock. While the lock is definitely
> needed to protect the setting/unsetting of the KVM pointer, it is not
> necessarily critical for setting the masks, so this will not be done under
> protection of the matrix_dev->lock.
> 
> Fixes: f21916ec4826 ("s390/vfio-ap: clean up vfio_ap resources when KVM pointer invalidated")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> 

>  static void vfio_ap_mdev_unset_kvm(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
>  {
> -	kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
> -	matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
> -	vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev->mdev);
> -	kvm_put_kvm(matrix_mdev->kvm);
> -	matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL;
> +	if (matrix_mdev->kvm) {

If you're doing setting/unsetting under matrix_dev->lock, is it
possible that matrix_mdev->kvm gets unset between here and the next
line, as you don't hold the lock?

Maybe you could
- grab a reference to kvm while holding the lock
- call the mask handling functions with that kvm reference
- lock again, drop the reference, and do the rest of the processing?

> +		kvm_arch_crypto_clear_masks(matrix_mdev->kvm);
> +		mutex_lock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> +		matrix_mdev->kvm->arch.crypto.pqap_hook = NULL;
> +		vfio_ap_mdev_reset_queues(matrix_mdev->mdev);
> +		kvm_put_kvm(matrix_mdev->kvm);
> +		matrix_mdev->kvm = NULL;
> +		mutex_unlock(&matrix_dev->lock);
> +	}
>  }