Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] blk-mq: Don't complete in IRQ, use llist_head
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
        linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
References: <20210123201027.3262800-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <4007ad55-ed6d-a081-8571-36b146bca5ed@kernel.dk>
Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 07:43:25 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20210123201027.3262800-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 1/23/21 1:10 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> Patch 2+3 were applied and then dropped by Jens due to a NOHZ+softirq
> related warning [0]. Turns out a successful wakeup via
> set_nr_if_polling() will not process any softirqs and the CPU may go
> back to idle. This is addressed by patch #1.
> 
> smpcfd_dying_cpu() will also invoke SMP-functions calls via
> flush_smp_call_function_queue() but the block layer shouldn't queue
> anything because the CPU isn't online anymore.
> The two caller of flush_smp_call_function_from_idle() look fine with
> opening interrupts from within do_softirq().

Applied, thanks.

-- 
Jens Axboe