Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:22:26 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        a.fatoum@pengutronix.de, Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl,
        Ludovic Desroches <Ludovic.Desroches@microchip.com>,
        Codrin.Ciubotariu@microchip.com,
        Claudiu Beznea <Claudiu.Beznea@microchip.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: at91: Fix the declaration of the clocks
Message-ID: <20210210162226.GA2246688@robh.at.kernel.org>
References: <20210203154332.470587-1-tudor.ambarus@microchip.com>
 <5bc4f5b7-5370-bdd5-143e-429c83447ce1@microchip.com>
 <161291845517.418021.17378265940034341908@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
 <CAGETcx9fjRhNmEMF2QoerrzGctC6MMTy+_znVTgPEm1w-+ehqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMuHMdWBZq8n6-8e-GYEEs0V9ZW--CSDCs=+u_bkr=aRW4y=ZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <YCOgnm2VkSinTYIk@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YCOgnm2VkSinTYIk@kroah.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:00:14AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 09:51:14AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > Hi Saravana,
> > 
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:57 AM Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:54 PM Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > Quoting Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com (2021-02-08 01:49:45)
> > > > > Do you plan to take this patch for v5.12?
> > > > > If fw_devlink will remain set to ON for v5.12, some of our boards will
> > > > > no longer boot without this patch.
> > > >
> > > > Is fw_devlink defaulted to on for v5.12?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> > 
> > Have all issues been identified and understood?
> > Have all issues been fixed, reviewed, and committed?
> > Have all fixes entered linux-next?
> > Have all fixes been migrated from submaintainers to maintainers?

This can never be true for these types of per platform issues. There are 
folks that test linux-next Then there are ones that test rc1. And 
(unfortunately) so-on ending at testing only LTS releases.

> > We're already at v5.11-rc7.
> > Yes, we can get fixes into v5.12-rc7. Or v5.12-rc9...
> 
> Yeah, I'm leaning toward not making it the default for 5.12-rc1 because
> not everything seems to be working, let's see how the rest of the week
> goes...

I think there's some value waiting until after rc1 to turn off if just 
to find a few more issues.

Rob