Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp1641791pxb; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:06:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxP5WLSKmWQgnrH7UwUiXbHNw5v2M2IkDlskUpk3Xf3eNSCIbkq1WjxD0c/HOvVDJCrcpmd X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3c1:: with SMTP id c1mr4730735eja.428.1612991175769; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:06:15 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1612991175; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IFdY30E18Qdm3d4UjoG/POPJvy2dzM8y+3vg0iLoiMeznYMf2T8JJ31OedjWuJMycG cmIRcKcRaAROBEgjVx32LaTy//rygmFYEulCTY9KIMSzpdpcek42C51KU3GqC4hipNOk +pho9IjYckkCJnVRwwkX3q5No9FJhaYRfuquaa6R2OCAjQ56vqb7Yu8SqM3buPXo76sq M8UMixe7KBcmGvqQi50x8r1X9+tChtOmB5NzZucnCzDy6Q403Ne51NxydkNQxNufCK+q Wh5YE2clsWw1KR+dO/CUd2ErYNGTzVfn9puHslYhr7nuTInpJDJFYkGTGmr8ppvVwlD1 tMzw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=ENOzr6xjO3GQpgbSD6bbLoPeXooC9WGlpjJfzIMnDjU=; b=EtkUXwVHXRPofFmojGfri9L58L7d6bDuC7uOWAhQZNXi413AyJ0Pf0MNmhjLV89IL2 2xuvMy0BFwmXvPDMIBJE4UhUzJ0HxVD5r516uqvTsI6cpP5Umg4ClX6PO15W77bXfC4B kQUgfIgWyrA/Yb8TS8o4V+g3y+IhV9/CvgN3mMuloVvIdfoTnOtczLW9QkrArAFyZw7y ghnHy1aXe+HYyPBr2RUnysGnBUiMwP8m7NoYyt6158QiA24eLFAPJ1IjYMR17aij++6U ECYCqiZ2ClyE7KMpyVxHjxegwUDIKb0w/G+NDxlAkKnS2Qa+vVuOTXlNnHvroB+7V2v7 6Ogw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=eWPMQlwJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j22si2053137ejv.680.2021.02.10.13.05.51; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:06:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ziepe.ca header.s=google header.b=eWPMQlwJ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233250AbhBJVD1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:03:27 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41740 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233236AbhBJVDY (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 16:03:24 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-xf32.google.com (mail-qv1-xf32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f32]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF8C9C06174A for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:02:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qv1-xf32.google.com with SMTP id a1so1563951qvd.13 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:02:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ENOzr6xjO3GQpgbSD6bbLoPeXooC9WGlpjJfzIMnDjU=; b=eWPMQlwJx9FTsLZHopk9ic4CJOMfVy3EdaxI75SqMMnZ/MxXgBVmjq/OPVeLGBEPNG FRdM9uQJSDBFKKarZP4bsuSFLUGonS5KRxViNDNMoajXRxTuZfdLAbU4YL3YSjQ0mCQj 3MzMo7HB7dpMk4wL0gzf9EFbddo1bHTFff3XXe5FyPujiKDO1i2Tp4MsC+bi8t/Mp1dQ XGVXud+7jAEtKajVRBkq/QObcZ3J+WtlW71TJzMm/Vzjwmy8K55Lpj1gJA03omHlRggS sZgOeI/eJbA18a5U7epZJGvq1TMS+EcRAEmoBF6SNMjaBGaX6EgjnV0PDDhsBD2IFnMT Z7Jw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=ENOzr6xjO3GQpgbSD6bbLoPeXooC9WGlpjJfzIMnDjU=; b=d1K4aIlZYv3N81bNbJ/5ZCRydXvfi1VpQtQigL0OC0iZhcUwIFrxaMUFGHQiNM620a bjaRS8f3Fdnp3wHoVlF5RF7UXl4B62FtmPA6CWZqNRB2EIfKnCtPbV/CkGi16VVEqkXO B+33JvGVMLXFHhyNkJcrSoc0XfN8iMDNyF9cv4DW8fTLueuC16rZVsdqgTPEmDCK47qa vF0cUSsrWVcxcuzTiDmoqjdQgUGGdYm1CsEgRHbsNabxz+1Z8MvfWfXw4hvXc8tiDSwQ NaGObOagJvMKh0ZUUWvvLRN4K4YDzubZuzxkUe4gOzPtAd9fcoi4PH7UHtKvpb3ue9vY VuXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338IrwKjvA8u8S04lBAQv+bFc84g4p6+RbbkGuZWfEFoJA7XF/D hKzxGozH4MTyelYuE/gKzeFRrQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:c27:: with SMTP id a7mr4541393qvd.54.1612990963899; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-142-162-115-133.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [142.162.115.133]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 14sm2304346qkr.70.2021.02.10.13.02.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Feb 2021 13:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from jgg by mlx with local (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1l9wdG-006F9X-H8; Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:02:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 17:02:42 -0400 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Joao Martins Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Doug Ledford , John Hubbard , Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] mm/gup: decrement head page once for group of subpages Message-ID: <20210210210242.GQ4718@ziepe.ca> References: <20210205204127.29441-1-joao.m.martins@oracle.com> <20210205204127.29441-3-joao.m.martins@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210205204127.29441-3-joao.m.martins@oracle.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 08:41:25PM +0000, Joao Martins wrote: > Rather than decrementing the head page refcount one by one, we > walk the page array and checking which belong to the same > compound_head. Later on we decrement the calculated amount > of references in a single write to the head page. To that > end switch to for_each_compound_head() does most of the work. > > set_page_dirty() needs no adjustment as it's a nop for > non-dirty head pages and it doesn't operate on tail pages. > > This considerably improves unpinning of pages with THP and > hugetlbfs: > > - THP > gup_test -t -m 16384 -r 10 [-L|-a] -S -n 512 -w > PIN_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK (put values): ~87.6k us -> ~23.2k us > > - 16G with 1G huge page size > gup_test -f /mnt/huge/file -m 16384 -r 10 [-L|-a] -S -n 512 -w > PIN_LONGTERM_BENCHMARK: (put values): ~87.6k us -> ~27.5k us > > Signed-off-by: Joao Martins > Reviewed-by: John Hubbard > --- > mm/gup.c | 29 +++++++++++------------------ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) Looks fine Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe I was wondering why this only touches the FOLL_PIN path, it would make sense to also use this same logic for release_pages() for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) { struct page *page = pages[i]; page = compound_head(page); if (is_huge_zero_page(page)) continue; Jason