Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751305AbWIXAj0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:39:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751298AbWIXAj0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:39:26 -0400 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:47305 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751294AbWIXAjZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Sep 2006 20:39:25 -0400 Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2006 17:39:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20060923.173924.78710069.davem@davemloft.net> To: samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] no SA_NODEFER on sparc? From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20060908000602.GJ8569@bouh.residence.ens-lyon.fr> References: <20060908000602.GJ8569@bouh.residence.ens-lyon.fr> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 697 Lines: 17 From: Samuel Thibault Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2006 02:06:02 +0200 > I noticed that the sparc arch misses a definition for SA_NODEFER. Is > that on purpose? If not, here is a patch for fixing this. > > Add SA_NODEFER, deprecating linuxish SA_NOMASK. > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Thibault I have no problems with this patch. Userland headers already define both SA_NODEFER and SA_NOMASK on Sparc. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/