Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 08:39:16 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To:     Timon Baetz <timon.baetz@protonmail.com>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: dts: exynos: Add charger supply for I9100
Message-ID: <20210211073916.apyqfins3x2q44yq@kozik-lap>
References: <20210130172747.2022977-1-timon.baetz@protonmail.com>
 <20210130172747.2022977-3-timon.baetz@protonmail.com>
 <20210211065850.1e4a8943.timon.baetz@protonmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210211065850.1e4a8943.timon.baetz@protonmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 05:59:04AM +0000, Timon Baetz wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 17:29:31 +0000, Timon Baetz wrote:
> > The regulator is used for charging control by max8997_charger driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Timon Baetz <timon.baetz@protonmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts
> > index 304a8ee2364c..dad950daafb4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-i9100.dts
> > @@ -384,6 +384,8 @@ pmic@66 {
> >  		pinctrl-0 = <&max8997_irq>, <&otg_gp>, <&usb_sel>;
> >  		pinctrl-names = "default";
> >  
> > +		charger-supply = <&charger_reg>;
> > +
> >  		regulators {
> >  			vadc_reg: LDO1 {
> >  				regulator-name = "VADC_3.3V_C210";
> 
> Now that the bindings have been accepted and integrated into linux-next,
> is anything else blocking this?

No, patch is fine. It's just too late in the cycle, so I'll take the
patch after merge window.

Best regards,
Krzysztof