Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <YCQvsdlnbnQN4Ruf@karthik-strix-linux.karthek.com> <20210211075715.GD2696@kadam>
In-Reply-To: <20210211075715.GD2696@kadam>
From:   karthek <mail@karthek.com>
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:00:04 +0530
Message-ID: <CAJ5zXr3ONFFHL7g8Xt=BjM9SJK16HEwiqhkBPTbrBTwa=DDqog@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: rtl8723bs: remove obsolete commented out code
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Should i send them as patch series?

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 1:27 PM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:40:41AM +0530, karthik alapati wrote:
> > @@ -867,10 +845,8 @@ static void PHY_HandleSwChnlAndSetBW8723B(
> >       if (bSetBandWidth)
> >               pHalData->bSetChnlBW = true;
> >
> > -     if (!pHalData->bSetChnlBW && !pHalData->bSwChnl) {
> > -             /* DBG_871X("<= PHY_HandleSwChnlAndSetBW8812: bSwChnl %d, bSetChnlBW %d\n", pHalData->bSwChnl, pHalData->bSetChnlBW); */
> > +     if (!pHalData->bSetChnlBW && !pHalData->bSwChnl)
> >               return;
> > -     }
>
> In this case, the + line is correct.  Good job.
>
> >
> >
> >       if (pHalData->bSwChnl) {
> > @@ -929,9 +905,7 @@ void PHY_SetSwChnlBWMode8723B(
> >       u8 Offset80
> >  )
> >  {
> > -     /* DBG_871X("%s() ===>\n", __func__); */
> >
> >       PHY_HandleSwChnlAndSetBW8723B(Adapter, true, true, channel, Bandwidth, Offset40, Offset80, channel);
> >
> > -     /* DBG_871X("<==%s()\n", __func__); */
>
> Please delete the blank lines as well.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>