Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751469AbWIXIBY (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:01:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751447AbWIXIBY (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:01:24 -0400 Received: from emailer.gwdg.de ([134.76.10.24]:24283 "EHLO emailer.gwdg.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751405AbWIXIBX (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:01:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2006 09:59:44 +0200 (MEST) From: Jan Engelhardt To: David Miller cc: samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] no SA_NODEFER on sparc? In-Reply-To: <20060923.173924.78710069.davem@davemloft.net> Message-ID: References: <20060908000602.GJ8569@bouh.residence.ens-lyon.fr> <20060923.173924.78710069.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Report: Content analysis: 0.0 points, 6.0 required _SUMMARY_ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 514 Lines: 15 >> I noticed that the sparc arch misses a definition for SA_NODEFER. Is >> that on purpose? If not, here is a patch for fixing this. BTW, some SA_* constants have been superceded by IRQF_* in the kernel, so you might want to check the new ones. Jan Engelhardt -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/