Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 11 Feb 2021 11:08:09 +0000
From:   Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To:     stefanc@marvell.com
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com,
        davem@davemloft.net, nadavh@marvell.com, ymarkman@marvell.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, mw@semihalf.com,
        andrew@lunn.ch, atenart@kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        robh+dt@kernel.org, sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com,
        gregory.clement@bootlin.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 net-next 04/15] net: mvpp2: always compare hw-version
 vs MVPP21
Message-ID: <20210211110809.GB1463@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
References: <1613040542-16500-1-git-send-email-stefanc@marvell.com>
 <1613040542-16500-5-git-send-email-stefanc@marvell.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1613040542-16500-5-git-send-email-stefanc@marvell.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 12:48:51PM +0200, stefanc@marvell.com wrote:
> @@ -1199,7 +1199,7 @@ static bool mvpp2_port_supports_xlg(struct mvpp2_port *port)
>  
>  static bool mvpp2_port_supports_rgmii(struct mvpp2_port *port)
>  {
> -	return !(port->priv->hw_version == MVPP22 && port->gop_id == 0);
> +	return !(port->priv->hw_version != MVPP21 && port->gop_id == 0);

I'm still very much of the opinion (as raised several revisions back)
that using > MVPP21 or >= MVPP22 would be a lot better - especially
when we have situations like this. Having negatives within negatives
does not help readability.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!