Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2795624pxb; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:14:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxu7AJNxrsQmws9u6a6wK3TzRUV3Oz0DdL2fO4m2PVmRxYHhC4hL6kQGsoptYLHbnHi1Ls+ X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:365:: with SMTP id s5mr2373447edw.45.1613121256536; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:14:16 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613121256; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TPk3uCq+ozR1KhpZ9iwDTzxxA6xSVSNPV6zLCYQYvnSwppsaELG4qLs1kqowydNxvE QmsWAiZPVe61rzUsnEXWbhgvrWy/7A1cWR1VIdok6LkKlxxE6HqOKuzupQv6S958H/uy 58tUtXYwXNUDyPOIskulj1V24Xfq00IL6kmrGaf2RevRybDGN2auI+7dnkvFLfK4zrmH ZXUWksB/qocplWFuvasK0wXaPP8HSzLgPq/zRBaOyWRW7mV7L76AcPAjVx5kxZuCJlLR LolMlxRCfDvLNMzqKQyHUbhgd8IW2zhF5cPvynW8CCANWNpuWjGkQMjWGFQiUcf3ldwo ZghQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=XAYDMc2/fGV71iZYwesEww5xPiihWpiXeAmZAyvOe0k=; b=m0EuNS+6C4BLqhvkwmSBQ9ezyPWhN6wfQmyls7EB2Cleu5A4lL2TcZ6mtQK9KTYbXW JPrP7qHOocOB36A60LcHz5JIsVd2P9HfD30p+93UbPrZTSsv3DbE++0t81QRUGbKBMOR 2DW7ZKRbQXb+jOHh0ZOUfoUjzgP2VwaJCCAe3qFiDmQke3L6HAzlS6FFcb39a2LhGd1u PKzD0R3qYgml2Zd9R00OMEZM916lS54VIlcBojkgfLxoUxXhHDD08/0f05L16cVOhCSs +pR1vCz5z3hEz3OFqMJSO0Xg+7cEHARH2Z5AzQ7B7hinDUQ9DQEAJzVLPSvmGSqzq6F4 KsEg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=hSsb0sA9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t5si5678088edd.296.2021.02.12.01.13.53; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:14:16 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=hSsb0sA9; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229833AbhBLJK5 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 04:10:57 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54214 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229889AbhBLJKK (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 04:10:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pf1-x429.google.com (mail-pf1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::429]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBDA3C061574 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:09:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pf1-x429.google.com with SMTP id m6so5449964pfk.1 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:09:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XAYDMc2/fGV71iZYwesEww5xPiihWpiXeAmZAyvOe0k=; b=hSsb0sA9qQpjNsE1O9WW3n3zgpE9fpzB81h8j99+J32k+ZetDL8aV7g2Xnw1diPi+3 /O9TzA6nFqLVjDMtZ4FUulDdOIyK18b29gZH9iGQ0ngFFF16O0wnvN7amLMJOF9XsRFY /h4WLS8edjsAJmgSPepLU1WiKv4aTlXIhF7u6vsMWVGlOEvL7mVlwdT8JC0oZW40xc5N fF4VmEh9dwgcztlN5HZE+JgqmHo5g/qHM54ahvkxM7fJbbEz+IQlCgsvsVjHvz+8kYFD rQ8uztveBTn86h/8VHnWk8eUKO/st+QUQXbbDftw4EuT47/dU4pjlzBjguefD8P2jfEC wbkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XAYDMc2/fGV71iZYwesEww5xPiihWpiXeAmZAyvOe0k=; b=t8UrTKyKfsei7DYWhl1l/JvPZglqG4iuhg+i51s/4rCUsadWg2Tchq9EwyFXFlZt8n MFap1HP/CD7poS2dA+sFNo9UqHOAsFKVqo8+eMsUQnsAh7gfd9gNJ4hPDUzItttIoWsK QDE0t/TzriE76dYRpnoy/hKghgPFNmkZ3d7TLRS4yQ8B5K/rrbobzMK30kweVfNjZx+F TULQJNSBsVYroFiEww1e22uyjHd0fD8Cc7/5fuF9Awp+gAy29MCTsTOQVDJukNLb9cRK xN9lXF03KdDXyFshlpKFaYaLGbkQT4uDzszxEu6R1Bw+D9cIEUHIfzgRQjynk4351nHh GLkA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5306dbt0zkAm5emKATVjlakrR4++ASgFbsMPOOIjhR3p3h3trHjF XRiTn6sGHHCtSX/oWNInhu8PeA== X-Received: by 2002:a63:3686:: with SMTP id d128mr2212533pga.240.1613120970332; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:09:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([122.172.59.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lr7sm7067253pjb.56.2021.02.12.01.09.29 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:09:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:39:26 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Pritthijit Nath Cc: vireshk@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, johan@kernel.org, elder@kernel.org, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: greybus: Fixed alignment issue in hid.c Message-ID: <20210212090926.ox763j3btrqfzzzj@vireshk-i7> References: <20210212081835.9497-1-pritthijit.nath@icloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210212081835.9497-1-pritthijit.nath@icloud.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12-02-21, 13:48, Pritthijit Nath wrote: > This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should match > open parenthesis". > > Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath > --- > drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c > index ed706f39e87a..a56c3fb5d35a 100644 > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c > @@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ static void gb_hid_init_reports(struct gb_hid *ghid) > } > > static int __gb_hid_get_raw_report(struct hid_device *hid, > - unsigned char report_number, __u8 *buf, size_t count, > - unsigned char report_type) > + unsigned char report_number, __u8 *buf, size_t count, > + unsigned char report_type) > { > struct gb_hid *ghid = hid->driver_data; > int ret; I can't even count the number of attempts we have seen in previous years to make checkpatch --strict happy for greybus. I say we make this change once and for all across greybus, so we don't have to review or NAK someone afterwards. Should I send a patch for this ? -- viresh