Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2798289pxb; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:19:34 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJypfPayVQzCYVTbj0YorggxhRMCRO2PDmuXfLKl1Nrg2LifnQUfOvt/hr6QdqPR0JOk8Sk+ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:4ec1:: with SMTP id i1mr2217109ejv.352.1613121573977; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:19:33 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613121573; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=fsss0407I/6dpp+huqpamnPQ4wqwAIR0q3k+ZzdR63EY+hK9G68N9+XVKU9rOJ6MaP J38Xfa3rHDPq0DwSciRN9KyRI+Vw/+Gi+BeML9KkZhHuwIxTJ+IenxOzqFo7dFY7yO5L qyrppdM7J4+Xi2grVIAapL/4ahiMqArxDHo0osSZH5F2Ji8qWJZIYeD6/S1OmMbRaY4a zU9ugcNCFkJLTWJTJE21bKBpYb9XnkQ+I/mVGt90Y81rfRPJvm5fSOF8gkMB4r7Ao2Pp VKK9F7M2Zz1yX/FPrysOEwL57EOAjF+3d9IDELmqAWOV+N9U3+3MJMk8Iv3lE+mjoT69 Ibcg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=4h7Fvv/32syN5/u4k3aEAhwqm3X9tDZ1O/vg8qoW+KQ=; b=o1yfIF1OmF6yszslrLZi/UCiMBArzAo5O3bKh27XrOfP/80lVyjQF2PNPoprOMI8p1 QkxxvICjP3NNA38fcLGppsCIYARkHzJea1IPTuyiLt+oC/hrptKeXO3mQTK98cSNXsnw +O2hLjQjz1Adymc3d9V/7asTbkwC3OTovSLq5ieY2VqLsxiGhnu32PHe8I8PAm76Qtxt 5SNRsLOijVxNLX7KqLWPWchC84OUnNSY/78RkKp1LMMNmbh8QtF27xdWCE2GicG4O1lr 3WZ5xoO3MDXuODd8t0VmQHWkd7H6sZ7DHb0RyTFFlrdY/eVYazsvmbHd3tUIpH6j4dRd jwqg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=Zqgm3NCR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k17si5892196ejg.72.2021.02.12.01.19.09; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 01:19:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.s=korg header.b=Zqgm3NCR; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229983AbhBLJSf (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 04:18:35 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38928 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229906AbhBLJST (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 04:18:19 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 89D4664DE3; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:17:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1613121458; bh=nx2t2Rhxo+mIa8vXQ7tFMumzY+Z/RjMflfQJ9Of/Y10=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Zqgm3NCRGXK9oa/oeBU8VAQQf6f1NpX7j4U7xuM9kgllYOAv2QoSWBuSmSCz3drPW PAtHg2WKZawEk7Ik+/18sZ05WJ1QobAZw9HQMTd4ScbOBPY549XikHdV/khDDOHpQw N+hqolVWEuMj2yeHfukPnkElB+3zwDUAjlGSyLGM= Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:17:36 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Pritthijit Nath , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, elder@kernel.org, vireshk@kernel.org, johan@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, greybus-dev@lists.linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: greybus: Fixed alignment issue in hid.c Message-ID: References: <20210212081835.9497-1-pritthijit.nath@icloud.com> <20210212090926.ox763j3btrqfzzzj@vireshk-i7> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210212090926.ox763j3btrqfzzzj@vireshk-i7> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 02:39:26PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 12-02-21, 13:48, Pritthijit Nath wrote: > > This change fixes a checkpatch CHECK style issue for "Alignment should match > > open parenthesis". > > > > Signed-off-by: Pritthijit Nath > > --- > > drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c > > index ed706f39e87a..a56c3fb5d35a 100644 > > --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c > > +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/hid.c > > @@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ static void gb_hid_init_reports(struct gb_hid *ghid) > > } > > > > static int __gb_hid_get_raw_report(struct hid_device *hid, > > - unsigned char report_number, __u8 *buf, size_t count, > > - unsigned char report_type) > > + unsigned char report_number, __u8 *buf, size_t count, > > + unsigned char report_type) > > { > > struct gb_hid *ghid = hid->driver_data; > > int ret; > > I can't even count the number of attempts we have seen in previous > years to make checkpatch --strict happy for greybus. > > I say we make this change once and for all across greybus, so we don't > have to review or NAK someone afterwards. > > Should I send a patch for this ? Sure, but note that over time, checkpatch adds new things so there will always be something to change in here, until we move it out of the drivers/staging/ area :) I need to go fix up the greybus vibrator patch which was my first attempt at getting back into that effort... thanks, greg k-h