Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: base: improve error message in
 of_phandle_iterator_next()
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@metux.net>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org
References: <20210208165806.25466-1-info@metux.net>
 <CAL_Jsq+aWxmA_tXnhi5PfMieZ0KyKj45kr=OUa8h4mEmn7yLTA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <info@metux.net>
Message-ID: <18570ba4-0157-d20d-5371-c0f223d33d4d@metux.net>
Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:19:11 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+aWxmA_tXnhi5PfMieZ0KyKj45kr=OUa8h4mEmn7yLTA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: tl
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 11.02.21 21:13, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 10:58 AM Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
> <info@metux.net> wrote:
>>
>> Also print out the phandle ID on error message, as a debug aid.
> 
> I already have this patch applied in my tree. Why do you keep sending it?

Sorry, didn't know that when sending it the 2nd time, missed your last
mail in the mail flood :o

Seems my mail sorting rules are still quite imperfect. I suspect I'm not
the only one with those problems - how do you folks handle that ?


--mtx

-- 
-- 
---
Hinweis: unverschlüsselte E-Mails können leicht abgehört und manipuliert
werden ! Für eine vertrauliche Kommunikation senden Sie bitte ihren
GPG/PGP-Schlüssel zu.
---
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@metux.net -- +49-151-27565287