Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2862044pxb; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:24:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjSdVgfuaEy9m3uOLnxHH8VmrbqyzHFtQYzRcUCQajBiZKgCmOzQooHUMUF47VIQy2LES4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fa18:: with SMTP id lo24mr2444796ejb.221.1613129052431; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:24:12 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613129052; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=nCFs6+HYZtoV7Ym2aXOqhTsEhsPyuCSxpZIga8bVj0iDGJadhdpeWPry/JM6f0apX+ jdTWfaZ1rqnJPYz0ym+Za1Fri7SbqukU1U0rZP8a+o4/Ya2xif3DbjPWNlKuA1hMYuE6 11fEdaYU5s2CP7+Sz4sPd2KOKeHCRHvdjJvyJ3Li/l1MoSn4JSroSTwyNA8zxrSeKFYB cfxzNItLPD8i7GzgpktG+/JpZzDdGtnioqCHf/39wEfQxD5AluMeEhrHP/DSUTmoKv/I VYJ8RYtaHgrGfKtSPikXoTF4mwdLtvkyFCrC8KBUKpSM075UHUJtCeQMo0HarnGmQ5Br fREQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=kvmvosOYzC6Mhv4NpRwlwmCj2XlQkQawnfrqIsZb8EY=; b=mBy67uPrGt9v6zBsuze6pnmWG4CN91lyl9UnOMnNGbx3UZSvS7RjTY9dEpNgtXqGx8 5h9XXtoA5rL9O39Bjc9PdXcJnOL/Kkc/Jx7jAI0bWHiSHUKsH7f9VoZMR12TuzDZNw6J 7sC8A8A2gNKCWCRuBV2eDsOmN0uxOb1kgzGJ3Yx27Q+Tp3/DEjjFksGeuZZkM7ZZOo/h B8RcMyf6bXaEkVS1nVRGYEOsVZ9irnkSfNvq+iin+uBDxfU0mUMZ5NqiTg95B+qXqJzg LVVgec8MbuDyzpa/dIPTZdhTPAt9JgsK9Nj/qfLwPg8BDRa8+KNw20n4HN5LvEMfpLVb kaTw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dd22si2213576edb.69.2021.02.12.03.23.49; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:24:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230235AbhBLLXP (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 06:23:15 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:35392 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230470AbhBLLWW (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 06:22:22 -0500 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2594D113E; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:21:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.37.8.13] (unknown [10.37.8.13]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D593A3F719; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 03:21:34 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 3/7] kasan: Add report for async mode To: Andrey Konovalov Cc: Linux ARM , LKML , kasan-dev , kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Dmitry Vyukov , Andrey Ryabinin , kernel test robot References: <20210211153353.29094-4-vincenzo.frascino@arm.com> <202102120313.OhKsJZ59-lkp@intel.com> From: Vincenzo Frascino Message-ID: <23dcb10a-7fc2-375d-2234-49f48461a612@arm.com> Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 11:25:39 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Andrey, On 2/11/21 8:13 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote: >>>> riscv64-linux-ld: report.c:(.text+0x5c4): undefined reference to `kasan_flag_async' > Let's do something like this (untested): > > https://github.com/xairy/linux/commit/91354d34b30ceedbc1b6417f1ff253de90618a97 Could you reproduce this? I tried yesterday before posting the patches and my conclusion was that kbuild robot is testing on the wrong tree. I give it another go today, if you have more details based on your testing feel free to share. -- Regards, Vincenzo