Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp3016581pxb;
        Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:14:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2n8c/vzNYDszndbEMFER0O3AjL0hPLNjHRPSo7mwVvvB6ztfx/OoZUgm3AofwRy7WD45A
X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d656:: with SMTP id v22mr3812124edr.349.1613142890830;
        Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:14:50 -0800 (PST)
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613142890; cv=none;
        d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        b=dKZh2tbD/STzn2NfBRIdy9P2bgHtCQm+w9p77OMqe+44eHjSX2pFgo1nGiFUbVQSNE
         lZKFKf2mir0jDKQKBvWLSmRQEna6NWIbHbqxy071VcxPHuMtXwzHtD9mAniNiFwHKyts
         x+dNQevsOrlGJY/xoqArFTwk9lg7wMvQV8xayMAYRUub1VeFATu9GDqjKOrDgWHdhcvM
         5jV9sy9/FkmIDeyNxyX9ToEOgue86pzWa3mb4LLvxEVTclMD0STne6qIR/oMccQDC+Ww
         yhgUqiLiYKdzUv7KVPNBOtsMgy5QxU0sMbTxmz5mtXJLtBRD+Uk1iS7lePDHU5k/7VsX
         XkKw==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816;
        h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version
         :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from
         :dkim-signature;
        bh=J5zSviYzFNvAujzba059XE5UV+AwnjzqeO456RU3ggM=;
        b=hKNKhLE6+Y9OSwZEUqF3DlWjXzTpbzxgFz3M66sghfpH5WlVJujJEla/F60D38MIB/
         F0VSQsBvvziGb/Vq+jbC89UZ+vWO90yDzgGNps6SXJGKRf3VvifCKekcc9c8N28YQDet
         YDeGQwak397D+7ENz06L1mJkIZb4970AVIBT7+N0hyL6q/c+YwsrkSYIDCfYugXj4qLq
         x59zMOkfhI8ELl6cJJ1SEVlis69F6dUmrHGNw3G8u0DOVCp/TfyPGUhxFbdKDoXuYcjT
         /w3el3S6SOKLKHayHjZkV3Riff9MvqgZAsgh4zAy7Pl+pQcOzvnRNmXzOxaa79ylKxqp
         ynjA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=l7ffahHr;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hr15si5707906ejc.287.2021.02.12.07.14.27;
        Fri, 12 Feb 2021 07:14:50 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=l7ffahHr;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org;
       dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S229789AbhBLPKm (ORCPT <rfc822;loserzhuang@gmail.com>
        + 99 others); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:10:42 -0500
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52368 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S229672AbhBLPKl (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:10:41 -0500
Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5847764E70;
        Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:09:59 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org;
        s=k20201202; t=1613142600;
        bh=k731R4Ul6UKTKtCgFca3L2FMVqQFKspI8tFGRTMpX9Y=;
        h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
        b=l7ffahHrls/V+BKwdGEjH0nw2dMGXFX4vD4J+4HDjEkrJfn7A+Iit3nqim0umEqGg
         lrZzaCCKvFPXGZTk93rdU0Ks5T6Wt8cFVFWuXxpGMucxQ4TupUB2X49Rocio8QqiWg
         9WZdy65piPAs6SLREtg3FyzkLMEUFfP/fl59lu6Z9PN7zwKPikEnxuGi0a4NdGk64d
         h6/RXRz9AifU3WIMz9+kUlGARFPTs8i5/ruIH6KzkCdCTdyTaeJX6/b1vv2vU+R6JX
         IWj+zZdU2sRtgIyVM3nt9whehyFDrp8ePHXLMa4tpAZALBgAOTi7FwOj9jbVA1m00l
         frBpPkiHNRKjQ==
From:   Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To:     Qi Liu <liuqi115@huawei.com>, mark.rutland@arm.com
Cc:     catalin.marinas@arm.com, kernel-team@android.com,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linuxarm@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/perf: Replace spin_lock_irqsave to spin_lock
Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 15:09:53 +0000
Message-Id: <161298304279.2372115.11035796889461732110.b4-ty@kernel.org>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1
In-Reply-To: <1612863742-1551-1-git-send-email-liuqi115@huawei.com>
References: <1612863742-1551-1-git-send-email-liuqi115@huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, 9 Feb 2021 17:42:22 +0800, Qi Liu wrote:
> There is no need to do spin_lock_irqsave in context of hard IRQ, so
> replace them with spin_lock.

Applied to will (for-next/perf), thanks!

[1/1] drivers/perf: Replace spin_lock_irqsave to spin_lock
      https://git.kernel.org/will/c/8ee37e0f97ec

Cheers,
-- 
Will

https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev