Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the block tree
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc:     paulmck@kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20210211164852.7489b87d@canb.auug.org.au>
 <20210211173802.GM2743@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
 <d4232318-0e44-445d-a7a3-1e2a018c824e@kernel.dk>
 <YCaqSuQBhqgAkWLm@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Message-ID: <793e83ff-3bd1-39a0-9037-cb3cbfb455e8@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 12 Feb 2021 09:26:28 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <YCaqSuQBhqgAkWLm@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2/12/21 9:18 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 08:26:56AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> But I think I made a mistake in that it should've been sched/smp instead,
>> which would likely get rid of this issue too? I'll rebase it, it's just
>> a single topic branch with just those two patches on top.
> 
> Right, I made tip/sched/smp with just that one patch. That _should_ work
> for you, if not, please let me know.

It does, I just originally fat fingered the pull. All fixed up now!

-- 
Jens Axboe