Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp3139502pxb; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:07:05 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxH2bTMLtdoY6r710XYkJYCYstIMqaJE9HtgRbqNpjO6D525cKQt2aFdSyPGIkA1vqD6/Tu X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:da1e:: with SMTP id fi30mr4115640ejb.151.1613153225510; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:07:05 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613153225; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=WIUkul0v3lQdblt43Q9544RpnN7WZk5Utv59rF37p93kGhLTycpKN0kAth/+R/4mp5 xZa8UkgYBdvNL3OchzfTzaZSaH7ZpD5EFtyyQyoedAngm+OgSKP7x3vdEh3N08sIHwtL DfU8FzpkzhB6Sln9/FBsPY5QlkSWVud5M+oeh8irk9lw4Le1o4OJNVZJgUlks/oG8uwm wU35XRU+9NVhz7hHPF4DD4ewc1aaJ5eAfGcu8K70dSyqBgVvWXPxmW+M/YdJ+dKJcwD+ 28V3mk5WpZpbJsfWHhMW40yN0U81d0F/JjnLjmvnPqfnSIoQ2uz+oqpQOYxgkCB3X2yP DC6Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=e7FvX3805mVbi8rUejyIm26agQLfcgUZJrMWSiLjNGs=; b=jRdsy+PEplqT4Ked7iyhOxZVeMIywEe3szdLJLQnPtIV9JZlkVVulKK4/lwagxgCUS eQo8KdYudpvHZbE4NYdmZ+T1LKU5z2GCuMKfeXnMnslgdJVKvNFHonfcMRacd0aKZoUl 59ALtKvZ6ZVB3qVfkzIcWRqnn6kw9v7xzVZR1AJloduDoMxB2j4hedTOeFbHiDaKrizq PS0gubHZYLEbxJ32jaS98IehyETemEWtKdgiDQztiMby3PpdUlMaW6IReeJm69USowbt YG/Gh7BqRwJrPsh5oTmEwEpdgRYsEjKsTTyjzbp/xRl2S897QdpFJdZiVE7+nktbdSyg WyfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lNMCouqv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b20si1337590edr.583.2021.02.12.10.06.41; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:07:05 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=lNMCouqv; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231293AbhBLSGC (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:06:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56032 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230240AbhBLSF7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 13:05:59 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-x635.google.com (mail-pl1-x635.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::635]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2DC2C061574; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:05:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pl1-x635.google.com with SMTP id a24so245379plm.11; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:05:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e7FvX3805mVbi8rUejyIm26agQLfcgUZJrMWSiLjNGs=; b=lNMCouqv+fTjmMB6cirFrl9lgwfiYme91mERyye0MrSQwDCWRBAA8nxOyadU0JP1GM 2+78codzGdNu57tEuXnoFu7IobxUP2aYirkbJr28Dm7BWbmrvwUwjBcmrPiAYh+qBgtO 2oi4c6DHF22Kn9p7hWKmzSLq3BrbDfp1snMMHl4gbxbz70OOyBegaRybHK+9kTsuJelI sX9n3adDZpn2lvnhNC9ZnBin4UlcBYC1LTzYqPV9XqtyKQVe7EUeGDgd/KTQlJ0iZiLp fwm/Zs1QqxP+LnnLT9T4qzF2MEyxwZGEGwECPkLtovPlelRmrQOiI2Cl779Kna3slRjJ PNBA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=e7FvX3805mVbi8rUejyIm26agQLfcgUZJrMWSiLjNGs=; b=h88VgQjiww7lonaGjvTneYaRQ1whgucgiy2sUobkOJBatsodP57ggqhLTvIriZbaMI FgiOjOWh7ZEZ1Rnjg+weFBseQGvocmrXoX5892Pm9eTbYHXTXptG9sg+UAPO/T+oG0op n/3MvrZUYscvRndUTnhjWV0BphhsLCJyPmfvhter5zOqDnxl99GmKNyI9o4CNq7Rtxsf 7ll8HmlgibQjS92QYewBgpgWIumAC1PPL9xunmn34XcESagtZjkc6zvR2lt+9EQ1TurB MNihg0UUkviyNKWwJnyxcOLMVyawQsbrxmc9X+ElRiAKUpciauJYepqez1TJ10nvlHV9 oxkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HHK29Pu3wFAjGm8RVgtC3l1IXl7E+BgEISnEdN6hQE7d2rMXF jzOr9Oe7o5GxDFfmywu7ibCdZmy5bGs= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:ad09:: with SMTP id r9mr3793493pjq.51.1613153119543; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:05:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.230.29.30] ([192.19.223.252]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r13sm10104082pfc.198.2021.02.12.10.05.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:05:19 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 net-next 02/10] net: bridge: offload all port flags at once in br_setport To: Vladimir Oltean , Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" Cc: Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, Roopa Prabhu , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Jiri Pirko , Ido Schimmel , Claudiu Manoil , Alexandre Belloni , UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com, Vadym Kochan , Taras Chornyi , Grygorii Strashko , Vignesh Raghavendra , Ioana Ciornei , Ivan Vecera , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org References: <20210212151600.3357121-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <20210212151600.3357121-3-olteanv@gmail.com> From: Florian Fainelli Message-ID: Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 10:05:15 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 Thunderbird/78.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210212151600.3357121-3-olteanv@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/12/2021 7:15 AM, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > From: Vladimir Oltean > > If for example this command: > > ip link set swp0 type bridge_slave flood off mcast_flood off learning off > > succeeded at configuring BR_FLOOD and BR_MCAST_FLOOD but not at > BR_LEARNING, there would be no attempt to revert the partial state in > any way. Arguably, if the user changes more than one flag through the > same netlink command, this one _should_ be all or nothing, which means > it should be passed through switchdev as all or nothing. > > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli -- Florian