Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp3298587pxb; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:51:19 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyjVEN5B/vgV6m9p+9iNG1ot5jsILIVJHlYIzoOt2xbfM0yIrgT1g9P7d2AKE/d8/TEZ1uJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:555:: with SMTP id k21mr5116275eja.148.1613170279443; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:51:19 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613170279; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=V/5adVM77E9IDk2o3yRyaZdldvrHtgdcrYIXoQBHfspeKETbBK9heS9HXTFbi5ty8C jCMS1qaW5XkP+czBScqOrsx57Mf6HlPRunNM0duz0mx4PsAbNYma0mojF81mhWaSU8ZJ ruh50kXm11Itx7dME7FjsjwtosKYw76dT+jGAyuK85SrOzCFTqAIvF1CGRzB+mvqezww /MmaAvqIT/4n2EQkwbv0Rri2Wr+IZsCyAxo/KykwXbLasjpyThS+FA6kMuDk5lt91Ti2 uPDO9wPYVa4M1m9nXBM7pZeKiL9nUIuA0V7BlwRZoh2dDQv4I5o62nh1auKRzSnAlFGS Zvfg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=nUItIC8AvpxN/ifxyQrgm5PhbIt2D7FId215syGUsUA=; b=0/9KH+3v6LqbQhiKFZ9O7x1ByqdpOPrUyk+r4ES4cIcceb2QxictHlOLF2/G9jiCC0 KfrKEg0Y2ZrzlJBHxtOtL0FmYD5WzN5qKdvqTY5qHGhtVb6p3v5lEmgn5X1lhWqVDlP1 v5Z3yF0Id9tGnRyfpE9gXyXAlDj5RHOMBN9v1zBh86e2KIESIeQ7q4iQ2+P2lrCMnFQS cMXaLx2vz0slSXewRvbBj450iE13yAIT9JAFlQHMKPhuwtnMVvobx1e8ImuK7ETqaThj 8kBPdcD7ZGICYmmVQ6Y2H3APN9yv9RMTTjiqogGYhA2gNoTm56nV3b/B/V5Kyad/f2Va qBhA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=cuwMLVZ2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id v7si8293791edj.572.2021.02.12.14.50.55; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:51:19 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=cuwMLVZ2; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232617AbhBLWsw (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:48:52 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:34135 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232464AbhBLWph (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:45:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1613169850; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=nUItIC8AvpxN/ifxyQrgm5PhbIt2D7FId215syGUsUA=; b=cuwMLVZ2FzMEVhBupYdFUzTcYJCJAsBrbaSVaW1DJGuErC4uMy5X3491zJvWBIhKYCKpGO eRXMcbZ7/AaeWBahdokZuJcRVj2epfuM3EWg55obuqaXy4UU9agY7qdIfH0YXG4KbxfmjB 7OQRgfBkaViXwUbdT5qFjdsgre27QqU= Received: from mail-qt1-f198.google.com (mail-qt1-f198.google.com [209.85.160.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-434-p80Ry_zDPfSYDk2eHeclsQ-1; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:44:08 -0500 X-MC-Unique: p80Ry_zDPfSYDk2eHeclsQ-1 Received: by mail-qt1-f198.google.com with SMTP id d11so1169459qth.3 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:44:08 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=nUItIC8AvpxN/ifxyQrgm5PhbIt2D7FId215syGUsUA=; b=pjgqWtiFrmFrn4Pvzokn86O/p3Pxm4XniiZ31L/hGPWe8CGNOjuIwINxVTmCgAtXBT b94NSvCQBnjpJlUqt1FoUm75uxDqleg4iYfiPJEnGKYc0YcYrBlMqt8MtIYjqikOunnr bkENcA6hloQySslMYnC0YqmZZo5Cy9DNFaiu3jhVhZ7n824BBaRkvrxYmXqENIZs7GlR J7+/wWMQr3GtU52PYSCbp4UgMU/PISIo8hF/9bgwDS4lGGTe5BJ3tT8MG5W35G/4ENcL TWmEKSK3KbXyctq+JNj/n2qsn+LFcNE3RXmXkKS+KL4QUvqaSsd3OublIsy8Br+OpJFM r5Lw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530FhnWaJQ+Iz1hTuFdWPjpIyXou99cVIURcTTTpQCdO45cTntUb vQ/VxlKHVM8lq0D/P7E7DxXjQXSXoGWNYgLymxknMmGPZPKTITNiNGxNLLlfSnqd73tF1sIiGhm e5R1ZSRvKF16mpNOaSTiqka8k X-Received: by 2002:aed:2705:: with SMTP id n5mr4756513qtd.36.1613169848289; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:44:08 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:aed:2705:: with SMTP id n5mr4756479qtd.36.1613169848101; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:44:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from xz-x1 (bras-vprn-toroon474qw-lp130-20-174-93-89-182.dsl.bell.ca. [174.93.89.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f188sm7216631qkj.110.2021.02.12.14.44.06 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:44:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 17:44:05 -0500 From: Peter Xu To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Axel Rasmussen , Alexander Viro , Alexey Dobriyan , Andrea Arcangeli , Andrew Morton , Anshuman Khandual , Catalin Marinas , Chinwen Chang , Huang Ying , Ingo Molnar , Jann Horn , Jerome Glisse , Lokesh Gidra , Michael Ellerman , Michal =?utf-8?Q?Koutn=C3=BD?= , Michel Lespinasse , Mike Kravetz , Mike Rapoport , Nicholas Piggin , Shaohua Li , Shawn Anastasio , Steven Rostedt , Steven Price , Vlastimil Babka , LKML , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Linux MM , Adam Ruprecht , Cannon Matthews , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" , David Rientjes , Mina Almasry , Oliver Upton Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 05/10] userfaultfd: add minor fault registration mode Message-ID: <20210212224405.GF3171@xz-x1> References: <20210210212200.1097784-1-axelrasmussen@google.com> <20210210212200.1097784-6-axelrasmussen@google.com> <20210212222145.GB2858050@casper.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210212222145.GB2858050@casper.infradead.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:21:45PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 11:28:09AM -0800, Axel Rasmussen wrote: > > Ah, I had added this just after VM_UFFD_WP, without noticing that this > > would be sharing a bit with VM_LOCKED. That seems like not such a > > great idea. > > > > I don't see another unused bit, and I don't see some other obvious > > candidate to share with. So, the solution that comes to mind is > > it'd be even better if you didn't use the last unused bit for UFFD_WP. > not sure how feasible that is, but you can see we're really short on > bits here. UFFD_WP is used now for anonymouse already.. And the support for hugetlbfs and shmem is in rfc stage on the list. Is it possible to use CONFIG_ARCH_USES_HIGH_VMA_FLAGS here? So far uffd-wp is only working for 64 bit x86 too due to enlarged pte space. Maybe we can also let minor mode to only support 64 bit hosts. Thanks, -- Peter Xu