Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Sat, 13 Feb 2021 12:58:25 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        PowerPC <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the spi tree with the powerpc tree
Message-ID: <20210213125825.6aa0da4d@canb.auug.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20210212122759.GA6057@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20210212152755.5c82563a@canb.auug.org.au>
        <20210212122759.GA6057@sirena.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/qv/XSwTuxVuIrfv4MLHh6Xa";
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
Precedence: bulk

--Sig_/qv/XSwTuxVuIrfv4MLHh6Xa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Mark,

On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 12:27:59 +0000 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 03:31:42PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>=20
> > BTW Mark: the author's address in 258ea99fe25a uses a non existent doma=
in :-( =20
>=20
> Ugh, I think that's something gone wrong with b4 :(  A bit late now to
> try to fix it up.

Not sure about that, the email (following the link to lore from the
commit) has the same address (...@public.gmane.com) and that domain
does not exist. In fact the email headers (in lore) look like this:

From: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean-OyLXuOCK7orQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gman=
e.org>
To: <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	<linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
	<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Sergiu Cuciurean
	<sergiu.cuciurean-OyLXuOCK7orQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>

So I am suprised that it was received by anyone.  Maybe gmane has an
internal reply system that is screwed.
--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

--Sig_/qv/XSwTuxVuIrfv4MLHh6Xa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmAnMkEACgkQAVBC80lX
0GzNFQgAmMzKZk5SdO78cr1fRqI6oOzGll9twzHgagqcjZwg9FFtyRIWl414wLQO
pg3Ssi1yGW/GOhf3EYAU/N01QesP2TSL/LJi8IjwGUqOWvAt0RAkIeb2pNSaW2P6
erhATifFN/F2xA87A3iXBOJ52JZ9zx5MJlDxLdqwRyVTd4H6W46QfFRHz9tFhz2V
UwaI/Ri79DA2uBq8RPqxvQy3D4Zoq63heeO9aQqK/pkQwbA2gdDfLuEcPMkEM1kX
Hym355gGoQt987niv+jsPjmFj7Pmb7nt6D+5W6pA2RME2vyNY6oMk5stCrDDNNjZ
3zsBX5x5bqMwFXii9zIK5Fk7+68t1g==
=eq/W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/qv/XSwTuxVuIrfv4MLHh6Xa--