Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp4570513pxb; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 15:44:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyEwaZ//pvCU9auOkx/5okS3MSQH/UBkw9r+GNasPkxMWZA3VNXJUQ2P2HeJS0zb7Qwbo/p X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:7687:: with SMTP id o7mr13354297ejm.209.1613346263955; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 15:44:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613346263; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=c001znLmomT1UyKu5L6eETXf/ot0RUMP1bi26ZwB96rWzrI4awblmCetLqKPLt+Yn4 k2NXMmGCIjIbWMb9WFqnzKz7Fh3mmy7A/hbIGHjn9bCGuLgzoVmKdw6gaWMcZOycTChp m4LbU3UT/W9HjSiyrOqQM2QhK9KR5uajU7uqTQDwFLKM9udMDpDPXfTigtQ9pn+r7Wd7 V15HJaK5Lk4sc3IugYTIamldTfZ3pDJj+DifVAPYY+NPI+6SLVcNBXPgvjjSc/UTABEw myjOvEKyRyVRD5EO63icPSHapAU7G/PXp/MGarC1u8fWl9UuBZW7usxL98nPMJ/UUZd+ uqJw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:message-id:date; bh=b8jM1TuBgG0Jt87WXJA7NKpU53GgxYyJcrdPVKUL4mU=; b=IrBI7Y4FMHQ5Ez9OSyioJ2RPHubJvs47fgbIDiI0eNeIC2QpVDmA/lYt86zbqGedPU Ww051U5MvaI0q4TOOfyYiDZP5ovl8q2esEl9sSO8B/L61jtJrHYZnw+ruRTKB0SX8CjQ hE2eIEkL0HCvx0scJEEKYEBijQV4pZ2svqrp+xxdeB8sK0O7+w6dM7msETERcWK4hU/1 0wXxgESy2jE98Rycah9oYAR4k22B/R2I1zxfQoQg1ygP4NWBRZ0lOQZSdaBEyustBq6E yOp84p2iON02mM7ahgapGebPWa7xzFPVX13hAi/jXZ9ea8Gu3RRFX1JifNjzZ8jeCBGp gqKQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id kl21si10999351ejc.630.2021.02.14.15.44.00; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 15:44:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230186AbhBNX02 (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 14 Feb 2021 18:26:28 -0500 Received: from relmlor2.renesas.com ([210.160.252.172]:46202 "EHLO relmlie6.idc.renesas.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229792AbhBNX01 (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Feb 2021 18:26:27 -0500 Date: 15 Feb 2021 08:25:35 +0900 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,179,1610377200"; d="scan'208";a="72058223" Received: from unknown (HELO relmlir6.idc.renesas.com) ([10.200.68.152]) by relmlie6.idc.renesas.com with ESMTP; 15 Feb 2021 08:25:35 +0900 Received: from mercury.renesas.com (unknown [10.166.252.133]) by relmlir6.idc.renesas.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 905354108E47; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 08:25:35 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <87pn1244gg.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> From: Kuninori Morimoto To: Sameer Pujar Cc: , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: simple-card-utils: Fix device module clock In-Reply-To: <93c9d656-8379-b463-e724-e48ce486c17d@nvidia.com> References: <1612939421-19900-1-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com> <1612939421-19900-2-git-send-email-spujar@nvidia.com> <87im6y5fv8.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <93c9d656-8379-b463-e724-e48ce486c17d@nvidia.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 Emacs/26.3 Mule/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Sameer > > /* > > * Parse dai->sysclk come from "clocks = <&xxx>" > > * (if system has common clock) > > * or "system-clock-frequency = " > > * or device's module clock. > > */ > > Yes, this can be rephrased now. Thanks. It is not a big-deal. no streass :) > > And also, this patch has too many unneeded exchange, > > thus it was difficult to read for me. > > I think it can be simply like this ? > > It is understandable what it want to do. > > I think the patch does exactly the same thing as what you are > suggesting below. Am I missing anything? Yes, it is 100% same, but is simple patch. I wanted to tell was it is easy to read/understand. Your patch is already applied, so nothing we can do now ;) Thank you for your help !! Best regards --- Kuninori Morimoto