Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp4701926pxb; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 21:28:46 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDAJaCPb7ch+7wVNzssytXeaf7achpskyX7uHJk1i8VDC2mEgu6T+tTQNVkq31K8xaRrRD X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3916:: with SMTP id f22mr14096242eje.328.1613366926050; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 21:28:46 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613366926; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bkx5y8rkRe3v1v40Z3zpGWfCPrThYprzUrTET644wmLXqjnlL6rTIkY58LyT0G49ZI 26Tx4WE94ViE/tgz1KpIi2QdJR9w0ulT509fk1SxzALgjrmIoWdc/6qoWp8qNEGRRePa X6HU4Yvw9lqB7FFQxwUH4Sont8UohaCOBgbdb6gKoh5b60pKL9POi+TNOeSgfHUsA7Ih +TS67/JDbcjV1bli9+KV0FzQwiJ4FQ9NA2POsrWOsR+HNrKQslDjpEp1SG/BS8v33gXs 9KTDNPzHlDeWESaEqeshWeEZKaVmzHHdWFY2eyYUdcxIvu7WqImXgpMgfX6ps6xHWzaH Utvw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=K0EDOS/BQuWFtNH3XKDZG00xGxoWByqre+yMWXLTano=; b=oP2libsYYW0ibTZgpwsG+i8v3uzKtJ6jzmtP0RLNBsjYUH/853kZyuZ+P2O5YQb2Si nClm+yf/Q8Kng5KhxdpQj7KuBVCFpRqGbTYnDukfHomCr+u1pk5sCXtCA5oYVWK3Dblr fBmlWBPwdchbIQ50iB5oNaIDEhnMnQRyEYAa7B0hyeiTP3QGRvi0qPniAjbZLzOqTcEx Ih/CGVg3JPKvz6FtFpVgpK1Q8+MdqjwS3iWMucg7u/Vb9EUODVMcpXs3h6DiQmnVBJM/ WIXRJTrm2aJOP1jqWCJBZ6XzZrD9Of7TbdQNLyjFIWwKedSOQyWyi2vnq3ygBSTmGsIX 5qzQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h28si14517193edj.387.2021.02.14.21.28.23; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 21:28:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229569AbhBOF0k (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:26:40 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50730 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229488AbhBOF0j (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Feb 2021 00:26:39 -0500 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [IPv6:2a01:488:42:1000:50ed:8234::]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52C8BC061574; Sun, 14 Feb 2021 21:25:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from ip4d149f6e.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.20.159.110] helo=[192.168.66.101]); authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1lBWOK-0006M8-4i; Mon, 15 Feb 2021 06:25:48 +0100 Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: reporting-issues.rst: explain how to decode stack traces To: Randy Dunlap , Jonathan Corbet Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin , Vlastimil Babka , Joerg Roedel , Qais Yousef , Damian Tometzki References: <20210210054823.242262-1-linux@leemhuis.info> From: Thorsten Leemhuis Message-ID: <5092d5ef-e790-3833-87be-e067c3189d25@leemhuis.info> Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 06:25:46 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;linux@leemhuis.info;1613366759;1a018989; X-HE-SMSGID: 1lBWOK-0006M8-4i Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Am 11.02.21 um 18:07 schrieb Randy Dunlap: > Just a couple of small nits (or one that is repeated): :-D > On 2/9/21 9:48 PM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> - * If the failure includes a stack dump, like an Oops does, consider decoding >> - it to find the offending line of code. >> + * If your failure involves a 'panic', 'oops', or 'warning', consider decoding >> + the kernel log to find the line of code that trigger the error. > triggered > […] > or it could be "code that triggers"... (just not "trigger"). Ahh, yes, you're right of course. Went with the former, many thx for taking a look and pointing it out! Ciao, Thorsten