Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750954AbWIYKL2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:11:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750949AbWIYKL2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:11:28 -0400 Received: from mtagate5.de.ibm.com ([195.212.29.154]:29549 "EHLO mtagate5.de.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750932AbWIYKL1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 06:11:27 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:11:24 +0300 From: Muli Ben-Yehuda To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi , Linux-Kernel Subject: mainline aic94xx firmware woes Message-ID: <20060925101124.GH6374@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 889 Lines: 21 Hi, The recently merged aic94xx in mainline requires external firmware support. This, in turn, necessitates an initrd/initramfs environment that includes firmware support to load the firmware. Will a patch to optionally include the firmware inline in the kernel and thus not having to use an initramfs be acceptable? Also, aic94xx does not compile unless FW_LOADER is set in .config due to missing 'request_firmware'. What's the right thing to do here - aic94xx selecting it, depending on it, or FW_LOADER providing empty request_firmware() in case it's compiled out (the last one violates the principle of least surprise IMHO). Cheers, Muli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/