Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <72bb7b9fc0cf7afc308e284c72c363e80df8e734.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
From:   Davide Caratti <dcaratti@redhat.com>
To:     Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210215110154.GA28453@linux.home>
References: <20210215114354.6ddc94c7@canb.auug.org.au>
         <20210215110154.GA28453@linux.home>
Organization: red hat
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Date:   Mon, 15 Feb 2021 12:35:37 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.3 (3.38.3-1.fc33) 
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2021-02-15 at 12:01 +0100, Guillaume Nault wrote:
> Before these commits, ALL_TESTS listed the tests in the order they were
> implemented in the rest of the file. So I'd rather continue following
> this implicit rule, if at all possible. Also it makes sense to keep
> grouping all match_ip_*_test together.

yes, it makes sense. I can follow-up with a commit for net-next (when
tree re-opens), where the "ordering" in ALL_TESTS is restored. Ok?

thanks,
-- 
davide