Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Message-ID: <0db021ca12f6a25861ea941f7ad7c9b9be968076.camel@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 2/3] docs: add documentation for checkpatch
From:   Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To:     Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
Cc:     Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 15 Feb 2021 07:55:50 -0800
In-Reply-To: <CABJPP5As+68yMdX1CafXsam4rg56aCWUzsSNx6kHjtQnaJ_ofQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20210213131513.51386-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
         <20210213131513.51386-3-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com>
         <b2e25e683a3e2f31d4dc2d666e082634e30643b3.camel@perches.com>
         <CABJPP5As+68yMdX1CafXsam4rg56aCWUzsSNx6kHjtQnaJ_ofQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.38.1-1 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 2021-02-15 at 21:20 +0530, Dwaipayan Ray wrote:

> Also someone pointed out in the list that some lines in the patch contained > 80
> columns. Checkpatch doesn't generate any warning for that. Is it something that
> could be added to checkpatch or was it decided against at some point?

decided against.
checkpatch isn't useful for .rst files.