Subject: Re: [PATCH] restore libata build on frv
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
       Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <20060925142016.GI29920@ftp.linux.org.uk>
References: <1159186771.11049.63.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <1159183568.11049.51.camel@localhost.localdomain>
	 <20060924223925.GU29920@ftp.linux.org.uk>
	 <22314.1159181060@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
	 <5578.1159183668@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
	 <7276.1159186684@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
	 <20060925142016.GI29920@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:39:34 +0100
Message-Id: <1159198774.11049.87.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 790
Lines: 18

Ar Llu, 2006-09-25 am 15:20 +0100, ysgrifennodd Al Viro:
> Fine by me.  In that case we need to add
> 	depends on !FRV || BROKEN
> to drivers/ata/Kconfig and be done with that.  BTW, empty libata-portmap.h
> is equivalent to absent one - it still won't build.

>From every public piece of info I can find and from looking at the FRV
tree your changes are correct for the ports Al. I can't find any info on
how legacy IRQ routing is done on FRV systems but if it is not then set
the IRQ values to zero and maybe Dave will stop complaining.

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/