Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750970AbWIYPYk (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:24:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750972AbWIYPYk (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:24:40 -0400 Received: from liaag1ab.mx.compuserve.com ([149.174.40.28]:46990 "EHLO liaag1ab.mx.compuserve.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750970AbWIYPYj (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:24:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 11:20:53 -0400 From: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] LTTng-core (basic tracing infrastructure) 0.5.108 To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel Message-ID: <200609251123_MC3-1-CC21-A7D1@compuserve.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 569 Lines: 17 In-Reply-To: <20060918151713.GA11495@elte.hu> On Mon, 18 Sep 2006 17:17:13 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > yeah - and i dont think the kprobes overhead is a fundamental thing - i > posted a few kprobes-speedup patches as a reply to your measurements. Where is the source code for the kprobes benchmarks you used? -- Chuck - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/