Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp5621905pxb; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 03:26:38 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQdx46Ej+W8ZHnMNj07qJXBtasKxjDFy47WcZJfF8eqwSWCawDgotcd3j7dPjqxq3YQ4p4 X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:1f42:: with SMTP id d2mr19855104ejk.297.1613474798484; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 03:26:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613474798; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pr5PasAslLhDdhvo3WVIaUjFQceo2/Hpu+3Wc+NE1nCWAJuc8wHzNtNSQV9xDPyT2t 4BJP0lrJF/he+0r/VsCFXt1RtJ+HDO+gBOujvCGB4MsHB2U1qJ+JrSZG09SCkTcgI0vA AIr1J/BBKeOAkJE8jX+KE7DNzsBJVz4Dc+NxLwTMffAhyA0QzsZ4Sd7WCfsOk/qBob+P sU8Zq/yl13eAOPX5Wt3ghuMhJ8hxAlXE/KJ3HN4TBV1Taxtwz6dauqg1U9fLeyCzTvJp TMXRAAuXROu3pSWSEOrehKGMj9pB6puBuktkTdWsZkzUd43VckLEuQSkNh+erCQtMmO5 J9pA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:references:cc :to:subject:from:dkim-signature; bh=tQ1UDP5cdCJOnIdIDk0m4x6l7OoqNMl/eT40Lh0UPR0=; b=ocJGG+60PAJV6t6wPMYP53Flm/iyjFE9HaXiobpSQptEuUiK0DnU6+5YFWM2S3WqB/ Dvs6eOkt1eijgXI7Fry/luPiU9dT4Q3TZ5rXoQ3DQQos7e4hTRAvsBdr9rkv5SkbqCWR c7cbjAgQDOEl+pL2Fi6hZv2Z3EZOmdEKKfi2syNBT2JUDzvFG+k4s2cVvu54lFxPOhNq R+VB+uxj5nH5KPJgjvgt6qhyc1rJsE/cOJmJ3o4XoI4MBCjIIXlBfZ+4sqv4IEduA20q JAHjXBZfo9mCjVtAwfLOekr7W6yH9zBHYor0yFUPz+8d/wALo/yHSIgoyYdOb40tImIq MkDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=TcTmnU3U; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z7si15883922edm.477.2021.02.16.03.26.15; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 03:26:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b=TcTmnU3U; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229925AbhBPLZB (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 06:25:01 -0500 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:39076 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229761AbhBPLZA (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 06:25:00 -0500 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 11GBMvuo017469; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 05:22:57 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1613474577; bh=tQ1UDP5cdCJOnIdIDk0m4x6l7OoqNMl/eT40Lh0UPR0=; h=From:Subject:To:CC:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=TcTmnU3UwG3wfWNIH9hQ3dCW3wwMUOxH1in80hi5Bck485afl/lScXQdPnAnCSRGB d8uFIqiKwV6ojpH0TeoQscv89GTYCFGCqyahiOVm7ddLJYEugZzSA5qZNtpIEyh9Jq EkJ72X2hu7tc8hKjQCnUA6FS5rQZyCBNu212IhJc= Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (dfle115.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.36]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 11GBMveR043990 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Feb 2021 05:22:57 -0600 Received: from DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 05:22:57 -0600 Received: from lelv0326.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.84) by DFLE105.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 05:22:57 -0600 Received: from [10.250.234.120] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0326.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 11GBMobA107909; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 05:22:51 -0600 From: Vignesh Raghavendra Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/9] Cleanup in brport flags switchdev offload for DSA To: Vladimir Oltean CC: "Strashko, Grygorii" , Jakub Kicinski , "David S. Miller" , Andrew Lunn , Vivien Didelot , Florian Fainelli , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Roopa Prabhu , Nikolay Aleksandrov , Jiri Pirko , Ido Schimmel , Claudiu Manoil , Alexandre Belloni , "UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com" , Vadym Kochan , Taras Chornyi , Ioana Ciornei , Ivan Vecera , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" References: <20210212010531.2722925-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <97ae293a-f59d-cc7c-21a6-f83880c69c71@ti.com> <20210212144053.2pumwc6mlt4l2gcj@skbuf> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 16:52:50 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210212144053.2pumwc6mlt4l2gcj@skbuf> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 2/12/21 8:10 PM, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 08:01:33PM +0530, Vignesh Raghavendra wrote: >> Hi Vladimir, >> >> On 2/12/21 7:47 PM, Grygorii Strashko wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/02/2021 03:05, Vladimir Oltean wrote: >>>> From: Vladimir Oltean >> [...] >>> >>> Sorry, but we seems just added more work for you. >>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/cover/1379380/ >>> >> >> Could you squash these when you post new version: >> Sorry for not noticing earlier. > > Hey, thanks for the fixup patch and congrats on the new driver support > for the AM65 NUSS! What's functionally different compared to the other > CPSW instantiations? > CPSW is mostly present on older TI's 32 bit SoCs and can support upto 2 external ports. AM65 NUSS is next generation multi port switch IP (up to 8 external ports) present on TI's newer 64 bit platform. It also has different DMA integration and has native HW support to work as both Multi Mac and Switch mode. > Also, do I get it right that you also tested the bridge port flags > passed in the new format and that they still work ok? May I add your > Tested-by tag? > Sorry, I have not done extensive testing but tried couple of cmds. Those worked as expected: root@evm:~# ip link set eth0 type bridge_slave flood off mcast_flood off learning off Error: bridge: bridge flag offload is not supported. root@evm:~# ip link set eth0 type bridge_slave mcast_flood off [ 65.025285] am65-cpsw-nuss 8000000.ethernet eth0: BR_MCAST_FLOOD: 0 port 1 Regards Vignesh