Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 16 Feb 2021 12:39:36 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, it+linux-x86@molgen.mpg.de,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: smpboot: CPU numbers printed as warning
Message-ID: <20210216113936.GC10592@zn.tnic>
References: <e964b2ae-7a15-a510-e76a-56d704949d62@molgen.mpg.de>
 <YCuVEDXyIu+yE4c1@alley>
 <20210216101449.GA10592@zn.tnic>
 <871rdg8dyb.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <871rdg8dyb.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 12:17:24PM +0106, John Ogness wrote:
> It is supported to provide loglevels for CONT messages. The loglevel is
> then only used if the append fails:
> 
>     pr_cont(KERN_INFO "message part");
> 
> I don't know if we want to go down that path. But it is supported.

Sounds ok to me. I leave it up to you guys to decide whether we wanna
change that there.

But I don't care that much about the CPU numbers ending up getting
issued at warning level so we can just as well do nothing and leave it
as is.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette