Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750912AbWIYUKj (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:10:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750932AbWIYUKj (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:10:39 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:50342 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750912AbWIYUKi (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:10:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 13:11:51 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Henne , Andrew Morton , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata-piix: kerneldoc-error-on-ata_piixc.patch 2nd try Message-Id: <20060925131151.4f73612c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <4518305C.3090906@pobox.com> References: <451826BE.2040201@nachtwindheim.de> <4518305C.3090906@pobox.com> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.9 (GTK+ 2.8.10; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1899 Lines: 57 On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:39:08 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Henne wrote: > > Heres a new version of the kerneldoc error in ata_piix.c > > The old one which doesn't apply clean is in 2.6.18-mm1 and can be removed there if acked. > > > > Greets, > > Henne > > > > From: Henrik Kretzschmar > > > > Fixes an error in kerneldoc of ata_piix.c. > > This is the 2nd try, written for 2.6.18-git4 > > Signed-off-by: Henrik Kretzschmar > > Several problems with your patch format: > > 1) your subject line includes-a-bunch-of-words-separated-by-dashes, > which is incorrect. Just use standard English. > > 2) "2nd try" should be inside the brackets ("[", "]"), so that the > script removes it during merge > > 3) All comments such as the first paragraph and "Greets, Henne" should > be moved underneath the "---" separator, so that they are not copied > into the kernel changelog verbatim. You force people to hand-edit your > email before merging. > > 4) No need for "From:" in the email body, it duplicates the email's > RFC822 From header. I agree with all of these except #4. Maybe you can reconcile your preference with that in Documentation/SubmittingPatches, which contains: The canonical patch message body contains the following: - A "from" line specifying the patch author. A patch submitter should not need to know the patch receiver's personal preferences and vary patches based on those. > 5) Another comment "This is the 2nd try, written for 2.6.18-git4" which > should be moved after the "---" separator. Otherwise, it must be > hand-edited out. --- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/