Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <78a7f3ec-f5c2-071a-506c-b19b21b9b04c@gmail.com>
References: <20210216223306.47693-1-hyeongseok@gmail.com> <20210216223306.47693-2-hyeongseok@gmail.com>
 <BYAPR04MB4965E7E1A47A3EF603A3E34C86879@BYAPR04MB4965.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <c186df93-a6b8-2cd5-8710-077382574b83@gmail.com> <BYAPR04MB4965E80E52DA1E8D90F4736886869@BYAPR04MB4965.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <78a7f3ec-f5c2-071a-506c-b19b21b9b04c@gmail.com>
From:   Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:39:17 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKYAXd9=NwCpFJ7NczFBF1diFV3mLpL2Sz7UQP-Pg78zaFtBnA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] exfat: add initial ioctl function
To:     Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>
Cc:     Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@wdc.com>,
        "namjae.jeon@samsung.com" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>,
        "sj1557.seo@samsung.com" <sj1557.seo@samsung.com>,
        "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

2021-02-17 9:33 GMT+09:00, Hyeongseok Kim <hyeongseok@gmail.com>:
> On 2/17/21 9:17 AM, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>> On 2/16/21 16:13, Hyeongseok Kim wrote:
>>> Sorry, I don't understand exactly.
>>> You're saying that these 2 patch should be merged to a single patch?
>>> Would it be better?
>> I think so unless there is a specific reason for this to keep it
>> isolated.
>>
> The reason was just that I think it seems better to seperate ioctl
> initializing and adding specific ioctl functionality.
> Anyway, I got it.
>
> Namjae,
Hi Hyeongseok,
> Do you have any other opinion about this?
I also think this patch should be combined with the 2/2 patch.
> If you agree, I'll merge these as one.
Yep, Agreed. Please do that:)
Thanks!
>
>