Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 17 Feb 2021 09:32:11 +0100
From:   Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
CC:     =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5rten?= Lindahl <Marten.Lindahl@axis.com>,
        "linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>, kernel <kernel@axis.com>,
        "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Preserve high speed master code
Message-ID: <20210217083211.GN30470@axis.com>
References: <20210215190322.22094-1-marten.lindahl@axis.com>
 <20210216075141.o4wjnwmmjze2p3cn@kozik-lap>
 <20210216220933.2wzmft72bhjptzl3@axis.com>
 <20210217080747.a7nqzbotszwlb3dd@kozik-lap>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210217080747.a7nqzbotszwlb3dd@kozik-lap>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 09:07:47AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:09:33PM +0100, Marten Lindahl wrote:
> > > Any reason why not "|= MASTER_ID(i2c->adap.nr)" here instead of more
> > > expensive IO read? It's quite important because your current code will
> > > bitwise-or old I2C slave address with a new one... This should break
> > > during tests with multiple I2C slave devices, shouldn't it?
> > > 
> > 
> > You are correct. It is better to use the macro instead, and yes,
> > safer too. I only have one device that supports high speed i2c, but
> > I get your point. It could potentially break.
> > 
> > > On which HW did you test it?
> > 
> > I used an Artpec development board as master and INA230EVM board
> > as slave.
> 
> Artpec development board with? What SoC?

The ARTPEC-line of SoC:s are Axis Communications own ASICs, in the latest iteration
it's a Cortex-53 and includes instances of the exynos5 HSI2C ip.

> Best regards,
> Krzysztof

/^JN - Jesper Nilsson
-- 
               Jesper Nilsson -- jesper.nilsson@axis.com