Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 18 Feb 2021 21:15:58 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
Cc:     rjw@rjwysocki.net, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: exclude boost frequencies from valid count if
 not enabled
Message-ID: <20210218154558.zrcymny7y64y3raz@vireshk-i7>
References: <20210217000013.4063289-1-thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
 <20210217055029.a25wjsyoosxageti@vireshk-i7>
 <4c9d9d44-5fa5-3ae1-e9bb-45cf6521b764@linaro.org>
 <20210218084847.743rttqwlmwyx6pz@vireshk-i7>
 <d693d999-7734-3e69-edb9-9e03fd2f0d1a@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d693d999-7734-3e69-edb9-9e03fd2f0d1a@linaro.org>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 18-02-21, 10:03, Thara Gopinath wrote:
> Scheduling a notifier for max frequency change from the qos framework should
> do the work, right?

Not that, but we need to increase/decrease cooling states at run time,
create sysfs files/directories, etc. It isn't worth it.

-- 
viresh