Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp7890391pxb; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 01:52:32 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYupOab8sm+HJfJEPhNBFgDc/TwGoMnqjLjHVCU/GZw/UGOPomKVhrxZltCPcrGzST+LFk X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5e59:: with SMTP id b25mr4418440eju.74.1613728352328; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 01:52:32 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1613728352; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=y85nVkFiRad50yGa40rsV1epWMT0JVdeQ8hlBsEk/WojGwGr5OYeNZpwIanjm46B3E fSknSaI7X0rzxNvuvRy6FUzyEj42qzGyqiH6v1tnO+QrgzwQpJwsML8CFrEM7BsXi7K5 gV2H3hxIbZREtgeA/JR7Twmm6Q0SL3VXTSp6Z0hQGTD+5eUr0LR+jsyeTjBdaJOk6DxK F17oqqXH+9Cc+ygv3hpMgAjbxam8I5aR8vaaRyf1NG/reYdX+wswzjDtKQKm3jQibD4j 3KBsSwrIOKFz3U+3xvTYizAjWb095gVYwPHJ4xTiJLGeNbqY5+mz5U0kr6qbPhAAZ9KG /NkA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject; bh=YT0NqdwqiGW04A0Xq+ESNsQUg0hSbCunbkbukNpOSOE=; b=Kpv7m4S0HA7BEUmR8ZbdBxv6e+Cel0d8AwJbanmn1+aL4v36MtwZRQH9Xz2+J/aGw8 9wbHiRprk5pVpeRyYRBMQFPlQg6k/cC4Dnki/mmh7uWgo7qh5lfNcLD3+/Rhn+nd/Shq HOeAVT1frx6VJH8j7xXyZqbOP4qArEVBytZjiR+eFaKv4vUo1cRFTOAoTSwpf9OqT4Sq r8LkqytOBWgPfuF6fdm+2zpuq8TJSezi7pnHB89X5VmlS5SBRLmIuNqgySNe86Pdu+r7 C/zvMs7SkJVsy9Df+5+GJLdF/Qt1bRXXcCONA5M9UMXB7nSF5Xe3ucpKajvwWPOHmi0o POEQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a26si5558741edx.311.2021.02.19.01.52.08; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 01:52:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229999AbhBSJuZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 04:50:25 -0500 Received: from smtp-8fae.mail.infomaniak.ch ([83.166.143.174]:44803 "EHLO smtp-8fae.mail.infomaniak.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229527AbhBSJuO (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2021 04:50:14 -0500 Received: from smtp-3-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (unknown [10.4.36.108]) by smtp-3-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Dhmxv3GCqzMq8xf; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:49:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from ns3096276.ip-94-23-54.eu (unknown [23.97.221.149]) by smtp-3-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4Dhmxt6plYzlh8Tf; Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:49:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/18] certs: Fix blacklist flag type confusion To: David Howells Cc: Jarkko Sakkinen , =?UTF-8?Q?Micka=c3=abl_Sala=c3=bcn?= , Mimi Zohar , David Woodhouse , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <160751619550.1238376.2380930476046994051.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <160751606428.1238376.14935502103503420781.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <2031808.1613665474@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <2152657.1613727952@warthog.procyon.org.uk> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Micka=c3=abl_Sala=c3=bcn?= Message-ID: <5c158c89-e7da-6ac4-9479-3c00f9e8b912@digikod.net> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2021 10:50:26 +0100 User-Agent: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2152657.1613727952@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 19/02/2021 10:45, David Howells wrote: > > Mickaël Salaün wrote: > >> No, the current thread contains an old version with an error in the >> patch for ima_mok_init(). Please take the last series (fixing this >> patch) that I rebased on your next branch: >> https://lore.kernel.org/keyrings/20210210120410.471693-1-mic@digikod.net/ > > Are you referring to the comma rather than a bar here? Yes, it is correct now, I just replied to the previous email. :) > > KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA, > + KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP, > > I fixed that in my branch: > > - KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA, > + KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA | > + KEY_ALLOC_SET_KEEP, > > I'll repost the series. No need for that, I checked your commits, they're good: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/commit/?h=keys-misc&id=508f44ffefbf879fbb82fdbc8bf1e6023b85158a > > David >